What are the documented valuations, revenues and bank balances for Rose Lake Capital and eStCru in public records?
Executive summary
Publicly available records and media reporting show two distinct types of documentary entries for Rose Lake Capital LLC and eStCru LLC: congressional financial-disclosure valuation ranges that list the entities as high‑value holdings, and disparate media-driven reports claiming very small bank balances; there is no single consolidated public filings set (e.g., audited financial statements) in the provided sources that reconcile those figures [1] [2] investigativeeconomics.org/p/representative-ilhan-omars-sudden" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[3]. Reporting and business-directory listings offer additional context but do not provide independent, audited revenues or comprehensive bank statements in the record set available here [4] [5].
1. Documented valuations reported in public disclosures and press parsing
The clearest public record cited in the reporting is a congressional financial-disclosure parsing that lists the maximum reported valuation range for Rose Lake Capital LLC as up to $25,000,000 and for eStCru LLC as up to $5,000,000; that parsing is reproduced in multiple press outlets covering Representative Ilhan Omar’s disclosure [1] [2]. These are valuation ranges reported on a personal financial-disclosure form and parsed by a third party (Quiver/press), not audited corporate appraisals; the Quiver parsing is the specific source cited for the “up to” numbers in the coverage [1].
2. Documented revenue or income entries reported on disclosures
Separately, the Rhode Island Current’s reporting of the same congressional disclosure shows spousal income ranges tied to each entity: eStCru reported spousal income of $201–$1,000 in 2023 and Rose Lake Capital reported spousal income of $15,001–$50,000 in 2023, indicating amounts declared as income on the disclosure rather than company revenues or profit-and-loss statements [6]. Those entries reflect what was reported on the disclosure form for spousal income, which is a narrow line-item and not a comprehensive revenue figure for the businesses themselves [6].
3. Claimed bank balances in investigative reporting
One investigative piece cited here reports specific, extremely small bank-balance figures: that Rose Lake Capital had $42.44, Rose Lake Inc. had $10, and eStCru had $650, presenting those numbers as bank-account snapshots or entity-level cash on hand [3]. That claim appears in investigativeeconomics.org’s December 2025 report [3]. The source provides a precise numeric picture that conflicts with higher valuation ranges reported elsewhere; the provided source set does not include corroborating bank statements or regulatory filings to verify those bank‑balance claims beyond that investigative report [3].
4. Business-directory and corporate web presence do not supply audited financials
Commercial business directories and the companies’ own website exist in the public record and list corporate descriptions, locations, and marketing copy, but they do not provide audited revenues, tax filings, or bank statements in the materials supplied here; Dun & Bradstreet and ZoomInfo entries describe Rose Lake Capital as a Washington, D.C. entity and offer business-insight products but the snippets do not include verifiable revenue or bank details [4] [7] [5]. Corporate terms pages and marketing language explicitly caution that website content is not an offer or financial statement and do not substitute for audited financial disclosure [8].
5. Conflicting figures and the limits of available public records
The record set shows a clear mismatch: congressional-disclosure valuation ranges (up to $25M and $5M) and spousal income brackets (thousands of dollars) sit alongside investigative reporting that quotes pocket‑change‑level bank balances (tens to hundreds of dollars) — but there is no single public filing in these sources (for example, audited corporate financial statements, SEC filings, or bank statements) that reconciles those differences [1] [6] [3]. Media outlets have amplified different data points (valuation ranges vs. bank-balance claims) and some reporting notes corporate information being edited or scrubbed from public-facing profiles, which complicates independent verification [9].
6. Bottom line: what can be documented from these public records
From the public records and reporting provided: the documented valuation ranges come from a parsed congressional financial disclosure listing Rose Lake Capital up to $25,000,000 and eStCru up to $5,000,000 [1] [2]; the same disclosure lists spousal income ranges for 2023 of $201–$1,000 from eStCru and $15,001–$50,000 from Rose Lake Capital [6]; an investigative report claims minuscule bank balances for the entities (Rose Lake $42.44, Rose Lake Inc. $10, eStCru $650) but those bank figures are not corroborated by underlying bank statements or regulatory filings in the provided sources [3]. Additional due diligence would require access to audited financials, bank records, or formal company filings not present in this source set [4] [5].