What is Rose Lake Capital LLC and eStCru LLC, and how are ownership interests reported in House disclosures?

Checked on January 27, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Rose Lake Capital LLC is presented publicly as a venture-capital/private-equity style management firm with a marketing website and directory listings claiming investment expertise; it is tied in reporting to political operative Tim Mynett and partner Hailer [1] [2] [3]. eStCru LLC (often styled “eStCru” or “EstVenture/EstVenture LLC” in past disclosures) is the Santa Rosa, California winery associated with the same partners and—critically—appears on Representative Ilhan Omar’s congressional financial disclosures as a spousal-held asset with large valuation bands that shifted dramatically between filings [4] [5].

1. What Rose Lake Capital LLC says it is, and what outside databases show

Rose Lake’s own website markets the firm as a global team of dealmakers experienced in mergers and acquisitions, debt restructuring and capital raising, signaling a conventional venture/PE advisory positioning [1], and its site includes legal terms warning that content is not an offer to buy or sell securities [6]. Commercial directories and business databases list Rose Lake Capital LLC in Washington, D.C., and provide basic company-contact and profile information consistent with a small investment-management entity [2] [3].

2. What eStCru LLC is in reporting and local coverage

eStCru is reported in multiple outlets as a California winery tied to Tim Mynett and Hailer; local reporting about a civil complaint alleges investor disputes tied to promised returns and operational difficulties, with Hailer describing the winery as “living invoice to invoice” amid tight economic conditions for wineries [4] [5]. Financial snapshots published in reporting showed tiny bank balances for eStCru and related entities in early 2024—figures such as $650 for eStCru and nominal amounts for Rose Lake entities—raising questions about operational scale versus later declared valuations [5] [7].

3. How those entities appear on House financial disclosures

Representative Omar’s publicly filed disclosures list spousal income and asset values tied to these entities: filings cited in multiple outlets show spousal income for 2023 of $201–$1,000 from eStCru and $15,001–$50,000 from Rose Lake Capital [4] [8]. Later parsed versions of the disclosures and media summaries report much larger valuation bands in a subsequent filing—reporting Rose Lake Capital at up to $5–$25 million and eStCru up to $1–$5 million—described by Quiver and other trackers that parse Clerk filings into numeric ranges [9] [5]. These House disclosures use standard statutory ranges rather than precise valuations, and public parsing tools show the top ends of those ranges as “up to” amounts [9].

4. Why the reporting bands, the discrepancies, and how to interpret them

House personal financial disclosure rules require filing within fixed value ranges rather than exact amounts, so an asset reported in a category like “$1,000,001–$5,000,000” will appear as a large band that can seem to jump year-to-year even where liquidity is limited; outlets note such banding as a key driver of apparent valuation leaps [5] [9]. Independent reporting flags that contemporaneous bank-account snapshots and operational descriptions (e.g., minimal cash on hand, litigation) contrast with later high-end valuation bands on filings—an inconsistency that is factual in the sources but not resolved by them [5] [7].

5. What the public record does—and does not—establish

The record in the provided reporting establishes that Rose Lake Capital presents itself as a venture-capital/management firm and appears in business directories [1] [2] [3], that eStCru is a winery tied to Mynett and Hailer and has faced investor litigation and financial strain in reporting [4] [5], and that Representative Omar’s disclosures list spousal income from both entities and later list the entities in large valuation bands parsed by disclosure trackers [4] [9] [5]. The sources do not provide independent audited valuations, definitive transaction documents explaining the valuation changes, or full accounting that would reconcile small reported cash balances with later multimillion-dollar bands; those gaps are acknowledged in the coverage [5] [7].

Want to dive deeper?
How do House financial disclosure value bands work and what limits do they place on transparency?
What litigation records exist for eStCru LLC and outcomes of investor complaints?
What public documents (tax, formation, SEC filings) are available for Rose Lake Capital LLC that clarify assets under management?