Which states allow lottery or contest winnings to be claimed by a trust or LLC without naming beneficiaries publicly?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
States split into three practical categories: jurisdictions that permit entirely anonymous winners (a small list), those that permit claiming through entities (trusts or LLCs) but often still publish a trustee or trust name, and the many states where forming an entity will not prevent public disclosure; the available reporting names examples but does not produce a definitive, up‑to‑the‑minute nationwide list [1] [2] [3]. The clearest takeaway: several states explicitly allow winners to claim via a trust or similar structure (often with partial anonymity), but in many places the lottery will still disclose at least the trust or trustee’s name or require beneficiary disclosure for large prizes [4] [5] [6].
1. What “claiming through a trust or LLC” actually means and why it matters
Using a trust, a blind trust, or an LLC to claim a prize is a pre‑claim legal structure that can place the ticket or the right to the prize in the name of an entity so that the individual winner’s name does not have to appear as the claimant on the initial paperwork; advisers routinely recommend this to shield winners from solicitations and threats [7] [2]. That strategy’s effectiveness depends entirely on state lottery rules and public‑records practices: some states publish the trustee’s or entity’s name instead of the individual’s while others require the ultimate beneficiary’s identity to be disclosed for transparency or tax validation [2] [5] [6].
2. States that reporting explicitly cites as allowing trusts or blind trusts
Several sources single out particular states as permitting claims through trusts or blind trusts: Ohio is repeatedly identified as a state that allows claiming via a blind trust, a commonly cited model for preserving anonymity [4] [1]. Massachusetts is explicitly referenced as a state where winnings can be claimed in the name of a trust [4]. Florida is described as allowing prizes to be claimed in the name of a trust, though the trustee’s name or attorney may be published by the lottery [5]. These examples illustrate the range: a trust may block an individual’s name from appearing, but the public record often still contains an intermediary’s identity [5] [2].
3. The “anonymous states” list — not the same as “trust‑claim allowed”
A separate, smaller set of states permit outright anonymity without requiring entity workarounds; several sources list Delaware, Kansas, Maryland, North Dakota, Ohio, and South Carolina (and some list Texas) among the states that allow pure anonymity — but that is a different statutory regime than permitting entity claims and the lists vary across outlets [1] [8] [3]. Because source lists are inconsistent, it is important not to conflate a state’s “pure anonymity” statute with its rules about whether trusts or LLCs can be used to claim prizes.
4. Important caveats: trustee names, thresholds, and inconsistent reporting
Multiple reporters and legal guides warn that even when trusts/LLCs are permitted, the name of the trust or the trustee is often published and for large prizes some lotteries (or courts) have demanded disclosure of beneficiaries or identities to satisfy anti‑fraud and tax rules; New York, for example, requires winners over certain thresholds to disclose name, residence and prize amount and may demand beneficiary disclosure despite trust strategies [6] [2]. Equally important: secondary sources disagree on which and how many states permit entity claims, and many recommend forming the entity before presenting a ticket and consulting counsel because public‑records and tax obligations vary widely [9] [2] [7].
5. Practical guidance distilled from reporting
From the available reporting the best practical rule is to treat entity claims as a state‑specific option: Florida, Massachusetts and Ohio are cited as examples where trusts/blind trusts are used to shield winners’ identities (though Florida may publish the trustee), several states allow LLC or trust claims in practice or by lottery office practice, and a separate handful of states actually permit full statutory anonymity — but the sources do not provide a single authoritative national roster that reconciles conflicts [4] [5] [1] [3]. Because outcomes hinge on local law, prize size and lottery policy, winners are advised (in the reporting) to form any claiming entity before contacting the lottery and to engage an attorney and CPA to limit inadvertent disclosure [7] [2].
6. What reporting cannot definitively answer here
The sources collectively demonstrate patterns and name specific example states, but they disagree on counts and thresholds and none supply a fully consolidated, current list of every state where a trust or LLC can claim without naming beneficiaries publicly; consequently a definitive, up‑to‑date nationwide inventory cannot be produced from the materials provided here and requires verification with each state lottery and counsel [3] [9] [2]. In short: examples exist (Ohio, Massachusetts, Florida among them) and a handful of states allow pure anonymity, but precise rules and whether beneficiaries remain completely private depend on the state, the prize amount, and lottery practice [1] [6] [5].