OF THE FOLLOWING STOCK TICKERS WHAT THREE LOST THE MOST VALIE IN THE LAST FIVE DAYS.

Checked on February 1, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

No tickers were supplied, so it is impossible to name which three lost the most value over the last five days from the list the user referenced; instead this report explains why that determination cannot be made with the provided input and lays out a reproducible method using market-data tools to identify five‑day losers (and the caveats to watch for) [1] [2].

1. Why the question cannot be answered as asked

A direct answer requires a specific list of tickers to compare their five‑day percent or absolute price changes; none were provided in the prompt, and none of the supplied sources contains a prefilled list of the user’s symbols, so asserting a top-three would be guesswork rather than reporting [1] [2].

2. How most market sites define “five‑day losers” — the metrics that matter

Market data services typically rank losers by percent change over a chosen interval (five trading days in this case) and may impose filters such as minimum share price, exchange, and daily volume; for example Barchart documents rules for its multi‑day losers pages and explains exchange and volume thresholds that affect inclusion [2], while TradingView and Investing list recent losers but leave filtering and timeframes to the user [1] [3].

3. Where to look right now to compute five‑day declines

Real‑time lists for daily and multi‑day losers are available from multiple vendors: TradingView publishes market movers and losers (including custom time windows) [1], Barchart offers a specific “All US Exchanges Five Day Losers” view [2], and platforms such as Webull and Yahoo Finance provide interfaces that can show 5‑day percent changes or generate screener results for the past week [4] [5].

4. A step‑by‑step method to identify the three biggest losers from any given ticker set

Take the tickers, fetch close prices for the last six trading sessions, calculate percent change from the close five trading days ago to the most recent close, sort descending by negative percent change, and pick the top three; use the same exchange and adjust for corporate actions (splits are commonly adjusted in public screeners; dividend adjustments may vary across providers) — Barchart notes split adjustments but calls out dividend treatment as a potential difference [2].

5. Common pitfalls and why different providers can show different top‑threes

Discrepancies arise from differing universes (some services exclude OTCs or thinly traded names), minimum volume or price filters, whether calculations adjust for splits or dividends, and real‑time versus delayed data feeds; as Barchart and various screener pages make explicit, these criteria change who appears on a “five‑day losers” list, so cross‑checking multiple vendors (TradingView, Investing, Yahoo, Webull) is prudent [2] [1] [3] [4] [5].

6. If a specific ticker list is provided: what this report will deliver

With the exact tickers, an authoritative answer will be produced by computing each symbol’s five‑day percent change using the same data source or specifying adjustments, naming the three largest declines, and attaching the raw price points and percent calculations; absent those tickers, the responsible course is to point users to the exact screens and calculation steps above rather than invent a ranking [2] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
How do I calculate five‑day percent change for a list of tickers using free data sources?
Which market data providers adjust for splits and dividends when showing multi‑day percent changes?
How do filters like minimum volume and exchange inclusion change the list of five‑day losers?