How do styxmarket's maker and taker fee structures compare to binance and coinbase?
Executive summary
Styxmarket’s fee schedule is not described in the supplied reporting; available sources do not mention styxmarket’s maker or taker fees. By contrast, multiple market summaries show Binance’s spot-maker/taker fees start around 0.10% (with discounts via volume and BNB) and can fall to near 0.02% or lower for high-volume tiers, while Coinbase’s retail/Advanced structure is substantially higher—retail fees reach about 0.60% and Coinbase Advanced maker/taker tiers range roughly from 0.40%/0.60% down toward 0.0%/0.05% at high volumes (reports vary by article) [1] [2] [3].
1. Missing data: styxmarket’s fee terms aren’t in current reporting
No article in the provided set mentions styxmarket or publishes its maker/taker schedule; therefore any direct comparison must start with the factual gap: available sources do not mention styxmarket’s maker or taker fees (not found in current reporting). You cannot reliably position styxmarket against Binance or Coinbase without primary fee disclosures or a source that lists styxmarket’s tiers (not found in current reporting).
2. Binance: low base fees, volume and token discounts drive the headline rates
Reporting consistently places Binance’s base spot fees at about 0.10% maker/taker, with clear paths to lower effective rates via 30-day volume tiers and use of Binance Coin (BNB); high-volume tiers reportedly reduce maker fees to as low as 0.02% and other privileged levels for institutional/futures trading can go even lower [2] [1] [4]. Several pieces also note region-specific permutations (e.g., Binance.US has different limits and fees) and that Binance applies maker/taker pricing across spot and derivatives, with additional discounts for BNB payments [5] [1].
3. Coinbase: higher headline retail costs, more complex Advanced tiers
Coinbase’s publicly noted retail fees are substantially higher than Binance’s: consumer-facing retail fees are often shown up to ~0.60% per trade, and Coinbase Advanced (the pro interface) uses maker/taker tiers that can start around 0.40%/0.60% and fall toward 0.0%/0.05% for large-volume traders—different outlets report slightly different floor and ceiling numbers, but all agree Coinbase’s typical retail pricing is higher than Binance’s headline 0.1% [1] [3] [6]. Several sources emphasize Coinbase’s variable spreads and additional charges on instant fiat buys, which can push effective costs above posted maker/taker rates [7] [3].
4. What “maker” vs “taker” means and why it matters for comparisons
Both exchanges use maker-taker pricing: makers add liquidity and are incentivized with lower or sometimes zero fees; takers remove liquidity and typically pay higher fees [8]. That structure makes headline comparisons sensitive to trader behavior—frequent liquidity-adding limit orders can reduce effective costs significantly on both platforms, especially on Binance where token-based and volume rebates are aggressive [8] [1].
5. Practical implications for traders evaluating styxmarket vs established exchanges
Because Binance’s fee ladder and BNB rebate create a materially lower cost structure for active and high-volume traders, it’s the cheaper option in most summaries; Coinbase trades on regulatory positioning, user experience, and convenience at a higher cost [4] [7]. For any meaningful comparison to styxmarket you need: styxmarket’s maker/taker grid; whether it offers volume or token discounts; and whether it charges additional spreads or instant-buy premiums—none of which appear in the supplied sources (not found in current reporting).
6. Conflicting reporting and caveats you should weigh
The compiled sources show some variance in exact figures—some say Binance’s maker start is 0.10% and others cite floors down to 0.02% with volume/BNB; Coinbase’s Advanced numbers are reported with slightly different ranges across outlets [2] [1] [3]. That divergence reflects real complexity: fee pages change, regional subsidiaries (e.g., Binance.US) publish different rules, and articles summarize those changing scales differently. Use primary exchange fee pages for final decisions.
7. Next steps to resolve the comparison gap
Obtain styxmarket’s official fee schedule or a reputable market report that lists its maker and taker tiers. Then compare directly on: base maker/taker rates, volume discount thresholds, token/loyalty discounts, fiat-buy spreads, and region-specific variations. Current reporting gives clear baselines for Binance and Coinbase but provides no data on styxmarket—so any definitive ranking would be premature (not found in current reporting).