Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the total annual subsidies for oil and gas in the US?
Executive Summary
The numbers cited for annual U.S. oil and gas subsidies vary widely because analysts measure different things: direct federal budgetary transfers and tax expenditures, broader federal supports such as access to public lands and liability limits, and much larger estimates that add unpriced externalities like climate and health damages. Narrow, commonly cited federal estimates cluster around $31–35 billion per year, while broader analyses and global analogues report figures that scale into the hundreds of billions when externalities are included [1] [2] [3].
1. What advocates and reports actually claimed — the competing headline figures that drive confusion
Multiple recent claims appear in the materials: one set of reports presents a $31–35 billion annual figure for U.S. federal handouts to fossil fuel companies, citing tax breaks, preferential leasing and cleanup spending [1] [2]. Another line of analysis highlights a much larger headline — $760 billion — but that number bundles direct subsidies with unpriced externalities and broader system costs, such as climate damages and health impacts, which drastically increases the total compared with narrow budgetary measures [3]. The International Energy Agency and IMF work emphasises that global subsidy tallies can exceed $1 trillion or several trillion dollars when consumption supports and implicit costs are included, underscoring that methodology drives the headline [4] [5].
2. Recent, diverse sources and what each measures — read the fine print
Oil Change International’s September 2025 report frames the U.S. federal subsidy total as $34.8–35 billion annually, and describes the components: tax breaks, public-lands discounts, regulatory carve-outs, and direct spending related to the industry [2] [1]. A March 2025 critique draws attention to a larger $760 billion figure but clarifies that this sum aggregates direct transfers and unpriced externalities to illustrate the full societal cost borne by taxpayers and the public [3]. The IMF and IEA work cited provides global context: explicit budgetary supports are a slice of much larger economic distortions when implicit subsidies are calculated in terms of forgone public health or climate costs [5] [6] [4]. Each source uses a different set of inclusions and valuation methods.
3. Why estimates diverge — the methodological battleground
The divergence comes down to definitional choices: “subsidy” as a line-item budgetary cost versus “subsidy” as any government action that lowers producer costs or socializes damage. Narrow estimates quantify explicit tax expenditures, grants, and below-market leases recorded in federal accounts [2]. Broader estimates add indirect supports like below-market pricing for public resources, liability protections, and especially unpriced externalities — climate damages, mortality, and morbidity costs — which are inherently harder to quantify and depend on valuation assumptions [3] [5]. Timing and scope also vary: some tallies are federal-only vs. federal-plus-state; some are production-oriented vs. consumption-oriented. Those methodological forks explain why credible sources endorse figures that are an order of magnitude apart.
4. Points of agreement, credible ranges, and remaining uncertainty
There is broad agreement that explicit federal budgetary support to U.S. oil, gas and coal producers is in the low tens of billions per year — roughly $30–$35 billion in recent analyses [1] [2]. There is also consensus that once implicit supports and damages are monetized, the social cost attributable to fossil fuels balloons into the hundreds of billions or more, aligning with global analyses that show multiples of explicit spending when health and climate impacts are included [3] [5]. The main remaining uncertainties are valuation choices for externalities, the appropriate discount rate for future climate costs, and incomplete transparency in some tax and leasing data that may understate actual budgetary benefits.
5. Who says what and why their agendas matter
Reports from advocacy groups like Oil Change International emphasise direct federal handouts and frame totals to support policy change, producing the widely circulated $31–35 billion federal figure and policy recommendations [1] [2]. Critical analyses that present the $760 billion figure intend to communicate the full societal cost and to motivate systemic reform; those numbers rely heavily on externality monetization [3]. International organisations such as the IMF and IEA provide neutral, economy-wide context showing how global explicit and implicit subsidies compare and why removing distorted incentives matters for climate policy [5] [4]. Readers should treat each figure as reliable for its stated scope, but not interchangeable across scopes.
6. Bottom line for policymakers and the public — what the numbers actually mean
If the question is “how much does the U.S. federal government transfer to fossil-fuel producers in line-item subsidies and tax breaks?” the best, recent empirical estimates cluster around $31–35 billion per year [1] [2]. If the question is “what are the total annual societal costs that fossil fuels impose when including climate and health damages or consumption supports?” the number rises dramatically into the hundreds of billions to the scale cited by global analyses, depending on valuation choices [3] [5]. Precision requires specifying scope and method; without that, different, credible sources will continue to report markedly different totals.