Which major U.S. state and national lotteries let winners choose lump-sum or annuity payouts?

Checked on January 14, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Major national jackpots — Powerball and Mega Millions — give jackpot winners a formal choice between a one-time lump-sum "cash option" and an annuitized prize paid over decades, and most state-run lotteries mirror those two basic structures though precise terms vary by game and jurisdiction [1] [2] [3]. The decision is shaped by payout schedules, tax timing and state rules about transfers or accelerated payments, and winners should assume variability from state to state because the reporting does not enumerate every state’s statutory differences [4] [5] [6].

1. Powerball and Mega Millions: the national defaults

Powerball and Mega Millions — the two big multistate jackpots — explicitly offer both a lump-sum cash option and an annuity option as standard choices for jackpot winners: Powerball’s annuity runs as 30 payments over 29 years and Mega Millions pays an initial amount followed by 29 growing annual payments, while both also list a cash option equal to the prize’s present cash value [1] [3] [7]. Multiple financial guides and news outlets summarize these two options for those national games and emphasize that the advertised “jackpot” is the higher annuitized total, not the cash figure [2] [8].

2. State lotteries: similar options, different rules

Most state-run lotteries follow the same binary choice of cash versus annuity for major jackpots, but specifics — length of the annuity, growth schedule, whether heirs can accelerate payments and whether the annuity can be sold — are set by each state lottery’s rules and can differ materially [9] [6] [5]. Sources note that while annuities are common and structured to deliver larger aggregate payouts over 20–30 years, some states allow additional flexibility such as selling the annuity for a discounted lump sum or providing mixed options, though that flexibility is not universal [1] [6].

3. Why the choice matters: payout math and taxes

The practical trade-offs are straightforward and widely reported: annuities deliver more money in nominal dollars over time but defer tax liability into future years, while lump sums give immediate access to a reduced cash value that is taxed in one year and may push a winner into the highest tax bracket [4] [8] [7]. Coverage from financial press and legal advisers highlights that tax withholding rules, state income tax and the winner’s age, life expectancy and investment opportunities strongly influence the rational choice, and that most publicly disclosed big-jackpot winners in recent years have opted for the lump sum [10] [11] [8].

4. Variations, caveats and aftermarket markets

Beyond the headline choice, two crucial caveats appear across reporting: first, annuities are typically funded by the lottery buying securities or an insurer contract, meaning the payout schedule and counterparty structure matter for long-term security; second, some jurisdictions permit aftermarket sales or court-approved accelerated payments but many do not, and where allowed the transaction requires legal approval and may be discounted heavily [5] [9] [3]. Readers should note that practical availability of selling an annuity or changing a payout is a legal and administrative question that varies by state and by the specific lottery game [1] [5].

5. How winners actually choose — incentives and behaviors

Although annuities promise a larger total, reporting finds most high-profile winners elect the lump sum for immediate control and investment flexibility, a behavioral pattern reinforced by advisors and media coverage; commentators also point out that annuities impose forced discipline and reduce immediate tax exposure but can be undercut by future tax-rate changes and inflation [10] [12] [11]. Coverage further flags an implicit incentive for lotteries to advertise larger annuitized jackpots to sell more tickets while allowing the cash option for the actual payout, a framing advantage that benefits lottery marketing though it changes the real immediate payout math for winners [2] [8].

Conclusion and limits of the record

In sum: the two national multistate games — Powerball and Mega Millions — explicitly let winners choose lump-sum or annuity payouts, and most state lotteries provide the same basic choice though the exact annuity length, growth formula and rules about selling or accelerating payments depend on state law and lottery rules; the provided sources summarize the common patterns but do not supply a state-by-state statutory table, so a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction confirmation would require consulting specific lottery rules or statutes [1] [2] [5] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Do any U.S. state lotteries require annuity-only payouts with no cash option?
How does selling an annuitized lottery prize on the secondary market work and which states permit it?
Historically, how often have major jackpot winners chosen annuity over lump sum and why?