Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does the US Census Bureau/CBP report customs duties revenue and where to find annual data?
Executive Summary
The key finding: customs duties revenue is reported across multiple federal sources—CBP, U.S. Treasury, and economic statisticians (Census/BEA)—and no single public table labeled “annual customs duties” is the exclusive official source; researchers typically reconcile CBP collections, Treasury deposits, and BEA/Census trade statistics to produce annual totals [1] [2]. For authoritative annual figures, consult the Treasury’s Monthly/Annual Statements for collections, CBP’s Trade Statistics and Fact Sheets for enforcement and collections summaries, and BEA/Census outputs for trade flows used in reconciliation [1] [3] [2].
1. What everyone is claiming — a short inventory of the competing claims that matter
Multiple claims arise in the source set: CBP publishes annual totals for duties, taxes, and fees collected and summary fact sheets that list fiscal-year collections (including FY2025 and earlier) [1]. The Treasury’s Daily and Monthly Treasury Statements record federal revenue receipts including tariff deposits and provide a path to net tariff revenue after refunds and adjustments [2]. BEA and FRED publish series for taxes on production and imports that aggregate customs duty measures at a national accounts level [3]. The Census Bureau’s International Trade Data site provides import valuation and FT900 reports used to contextualize duties but is not always the primary repository for collected-revenue totals [4] [5]. These claims create overlapping but distinct datasets tied to collections, accounting, and trade flows.
2. Where each agency actually publishes numbers and why they differ — separating collection from accounting
CBP’s Trade Statistics and Trade Fact Sheets post administrative collections and program metrics—these are snapshots of gross duties, taxes, and fees CBP assessed and collected at the border and in enforcement actions [1] [6]. The Treasury’s Daily/Monthly Statements show deposits and net receipts after intra-government transfers, excise categorizations, and refunds; the Treasury figure is the official federal-revenue accounting entry [2]. BEA/Census produce macroeconomic and trade-flow statistics that underpin tariff incidence and may report tariffs within national accounts series; these are conceptually linked but not book-keeping collections documents [3] [4]. Differences arise because CBP reports operational collections, Treasury reports fiscal accounting net receipts, and BEA/Census embed duties in broader economic statistics.
3. How researchers reconcile these streams — practical reconciliation steps and common pitfalls
Researchers start with CBP’s gross collections, then use Treasury statements to adjust for refunds, rebates, and reclassifications to calculate net revenue booked to the federal government for a fiscal period [1] [2]. BEA or FRED series are consulted when aligning collections with macroeconomic measures or when seasonally adjusting and converting to consistent accounts [3]. Common pitfalls include conflating fiscal-year CBP collections with calendar-year trade statistics, ignoring tariff refunds or trade-remedy offsets, and relying on headline CBP totals without checking Treasury adjustments [1] [2]. Careful users note whether figures are fiscal or calendar year and whether numbers are gross or net, since the choice materially changes reported totals.
4. Where to find annual numbers quickly — the practical path to a single-year total
To get an authoritative annual total, first pull the Treasury’s Monthly Treasury Statement for the fiscal year and extract the deposits line items tied to customs/tariffs [2]. Then consult CBP’s Trade Statistics page and annual Trade Fact Sheet for a corroborating administrative total and breakdowns by duty type and enforcement that clarify sources of variance [1] [6]. Use BEA/FRED series such as taxes on production and imports for an alternate economy-wide perspective or to check seasonally adjusted trends [3]. Combine these three: Treasury for official booked revenue, CBP for operational context, and BEA/Census for trade-flow alignment; this triangulation yields the cleanest annual number.
5. Recent headline numbers and why they can look contradictory
Sources report large year-to-year swings: one set lists FY2025 customs duty collections near $195 billion versus roughly $77–$88 billion for FY2024 depending on the reporting source [5] [1]. These discrepancies stem from differences in whether numbers are gross CBP collections or Treasury net receipts, how trade-remedy duties and Section 301/232/201 tariffs are treated, and timing or one-off adjustments recorded in a given fiscal month [1] [2]. Analysts must therefore confirm whether a cited figure is CBP’s operational total, Treasury’s booked revenue, or an aggregate produced by stitching BEA/Census trade volumes to tariff rates; otherwise comparisons across years may be misleading.
6. What to watch for and final practical caveats before you cite a number
When citing customs duties, always specify source agency, fiscal versus calendar year, and gross versus net treatment; failure to do so is the single biggest driver of apparent contradictions across public reports [2] [4]. Watch for trade-remedy and special tariff program line items (Sections 201/232/301) that can cause sudden jumps and are emphasized in CBP enforcement reports but require Treasury adjustment to reflect net revenue [1]. Finally, remember that BEA/Census trade statistics are indispensable for context but do not substitute for Treasury’s revenue accounting—use the Treasury Monthly Statements for the official annual revenue number and CBP and BEA/Census to explain how that number arose [2] [4].