How do US tariff collections in 2025 compare to previous years and historical peaks?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
U.S. tariff collections surged in 2025 well above recent years: multiple trackers and government statements put fiscal‑year 2025 customs duties between roughly $195 billion and more than $200 billion, compared with $77 billion in FY2024 and a pre‑2025 peak of about $108 billion in FY2022 (Treasury/CBP and analysts) [1] [2] [3]. Historical context: tariffs once supplied the bulk of federal revenue in the 18th and 19th centuries, but since mid‑20th century they generally represented under 2% of receipts until the 2025 spike [4] [5].
1. A sudden, large jump in 2025 collections—how big and who’s reporting it
Customs and Border Protection and media reports place 2025 collections at roughly $195–$205 billion for FY2025 or calendar‑year totals exceeding $200 billion, reflecting the wave of administration tariffs implemented from January 2025 onward [1] [6] [2]. Independent trackers show somewhat lower running totals earlier in the year — the Peterson Institute reported $179 billion through September, and Penn Wharton estimated about $101.2 billion generated between January and August — highlighting differences in cutoffs, fiscal vs. calendar measures, and behavioral adjustments by importers [7] [8].
2. Compared with immediate prior years: a multiple, not a marginal increase
By conventional measures the jump is dramatic: FY2024 tariff revenue was roughly $77 billion, FY2022 had reached about $108 billion, and many sources say FY2025 more than doubles or even triples recent-year receipts [3] [9] [1]. The Congressional Budget Office’s baseline before the 2025 tariff changes had projected about $80 billion in customs duties for FY2025; actual collections far exceeded that projection once new tariffs ramped up [10].
3. Why numbers differ: timing, definitions and legal uncertainty
Analysts and agencies use different windows (calendar year vs. fiscal year vs. year‑to‑date), and some reports count gross deposits while others net refunds or account for delayed liquidations. Groups such as Penn Wharton, PIIE and the Bipartisan Policy Center flag importer behavior (front‑loading, substitution) and administrative delays that make short‑run totals noisy; courts have also ruled some 2025 tariffs unlawful, creating the prospect of large refunds that would lower net revenue if upheld [8] [7] [11].
4. How 2025 stacks up against historical peaks
Historically, customs duties were the dominant federal revenue source in the 18th and 19th centuries, sometimes supplying 80–95% of receipts; by the modern era tariffs usually provided a sliver of revenue (often under 2% of receipts) until the 2025 spike [4] [5]. In nominal dollars the earlier recent high was FY2022 at about $108.2 billion; 2025’s roughly $195–$205+ billion represents the largest modern‑era single‑year haul reported in available sources [3] [1].
5. Big‑picture fiscal and economic implications reported by analysts
CBO and budget modelers project that if the 2025 tariff structure persisted, the cumulative fiscal effect would be large — CBO updated estimates say newly implemented tariffs (Jan–Nov 2025) could reduce primary deficits by $2.5 trillion over 11 years under persistence assumptions [12]. Other research groups (Yale Budget Lab, Tax Policy Center, Budget Lab at Yale) warn of notable macroeconomic costs — slower GDP growth, employment effects and negative “dynamic” revenue offsets — so headline revenue numbers overstate net gains when economy‑wide feedbacks and retaliation are included [5] [13] [14].
6. Legal risk and the possibility of refunds
Several outlets and analysts note ongoing litigation: lower courts have invalidated some IEEPA‑based tariffs and businesses are suing to preserve refund rights; if higher courts require refunds, a substantial share of 2025 receipts could be returned — one estimate suggests roughly $90 billion might be at risk of refund in certain scenarios [1] [11]. Available sources say the Supreme Court was considering challenges as of late 2025 [6] [11].
7. Two competing narratives: revenue windfall vs. economic cost
Administration officials and Treasury allies frame higher collections as a revenue victory and budget relief, citing the raw dollar gains [15] [6]. Independent budget analysts and academic modelers counter that much revenue could be temporary or offset by economic damage, reduced other tax bases, and international retaliation — they emphasize distributional harms and long‑run downside to GDP [12] [13] [5].
8. Limits of current reporting and what’s not in the sources
Available sources give multiple estimates and clear reporting on FY2025 totals and projections, but they do not settle net long‑run revenue once litigation, refunds, macroeconomic feedbacks, and full retaliation are resolved; detailed final accounting through late‑2025 and beyond is still unsettled in the sources [1] [12] [11]. Sources do not provide a definitive post‑litigation net revenue figure (not found in current reporting).
Bottom line: 2025 represents an outlier year for U.S. tariff receipts in modern times — several sources place collections near or above $195–$205 billion, dwarfing the recent $77 billion in FY2024 and earlier peaks — but the permanence and net fiscal value of that haul are contested and depend on litigation outcomes, behavioral responses, and macroeconomic feedbacks [1] [3] [12].