Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which USDA budget account funds SNAP benefits and what is its fiscal year 2025 appropriation?
Executive Summary
SNAP benefits are administered by USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service within the Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services mission area; the program’s funding is treated as mandatory nutrition assistance in USDA and appropriations work [1] [2]. For fiscal year 2025, legislative and executive documents show competing figures near $123.2 billion for SNAP mandatory funding—House $123.16 billion, Senate $123.22 billion, and the Administration requested $123.32 billion—while Congressional Budget Office baseline estimates present a lower line for benefit budget authority [3] [4].
**1. Who Actually Holds the Purse Strings for SNAP? — The Food and Nutrition Service Is the Operational and Budgetary Home**
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is funded and administered through the USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), which sits inside the department’s Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services mission area; FNS is the operating account that carries SNAP policy, benefit payments, and most administrative funding in USDA budget documents [1] [2]. USDA budget summaries and explanatory notes group SNAP within mandatory nutrition programs rather than discretionary program lines, meaning most SNAP costs are covered by mandatory appropriations that flow through FNS program accounts. The 2025 Budget Summary and explanatory notes repeatedly identify FNS as the locus for SNAP program operations, which explains why analysts and appropriations text point to FNS and the Domestic Food Programs portions of Agriculture appropriations when tracking SNAP funding [5] [1].
2. What Numbers Appear in FY2025 Deliberations — Three Close But Distinct Totals
Congressional action and the Administration’s request for FY2025 show three closely clustered mandatory funding figures for SNAP: the House-reported Agriculture appropriations bill at $123.16 billion, the Senate-reported bill at $123.22 billion, and the Biden Administration’s request at $123.32 billion; these figures were reported in February 2025 materials summarizing Agriculture and related agencies appropriations [3]. All three figures represent the intended total mandatory funding for SNAP in FY2025 as presented in competing legislative and executive documents, and they reflect the scale of program costs Congress and the Executive anticipated during appropriations drafting. These numbers were not, however, finalized into an enacted appropriations measure at the time those summaries were prepared [3].
3. A Different Angle — CBO’s Baseline and the Benefit-Only Perspective
Budget analysts use different metrics: the Congressional Budget Office presented a baseline estimate of about $95.7 billion in budget authority for SNAP benefits specifically, and roughly $106.1 billion when including benefits, territories (Puerto Rico, American Samoa), and administrative costs in its January 2025 baseline. That difference stems from how CBO isolates benefit outlays from broader mandatory program lines and territorial block grants, which means CBO’s lower “benefit-only” figure is not directly contradictory to the $123+ billion totals in appropriations texts—those higher totals often encompass broader mandatory program elements, timing, and technical scoring differences [4]. Analysts must therefore be explicit whether they reference total mandatory SNAP appropriations or CBO-style benefit budget authority when comparing figures.
4. Why the Numbers Didn’t Lock In — Continuing Resolutions and Timing Risks
The FY2025 SNAP appropriation picture remained unsettled because the government was operating under continuing resolutions and appropriations negotiations; the FY2025 continuing resolution in these sources was set to expire March 14, 2025, leaving the annual Agriculture appropriations subject to further congressional action or another CR [3]. As a consequence, reported House and Senate bill totals reflect committee-reported or chamber-reported positions rather than an enacted law, and the Administration’s requested figure represents executive policy preference rather than final spending. This timing left states and FNS planning under uncertainty and created the possibility of program adjustments if appropriations, scoring, or emergency transfers differed from those reported figures.
5. Operational Consequences — Reduced Allotments and Administrative Pressures
Funding uncertainty translated into operational consequences: by November 2025, FNS was notifying states of changes driven by limited federal funding that would reduce maximum allotments to 50 percent of eligible household allotments for that month, a sign that cash flow and scoring shortfalls can force benefit reductions absent additional appropriations or emergency transfers [6]. FNS continued to fund state administrative expenses, but benefit levels and timing became vulnerable when mandatory account balances and intergovernmental transfers were strained. This demonstrates how legislative timing and budget scoring translate into concrete changes for beneficiaries and state agencies.
6. Bottom Line for the Original Question — Account and the Best Available FY2025 Figures
The definitive USDA account that funds SNAP benefits is the Food and Nutrition Service within USDA’s Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services mission area; that is the operational and budgetary vehicle listed across USDA materials [1] [2]. For FY2025, the best available legislative and executive figures converge around $123.16–$123.32 billion in mandatory SNAP funding (House $123.16B, Senate $123.22B, Administration $123.32B), while CBO’s baseline shows a different, lower benefit-only estimate (about $95.7B for benefits, $106.1B including territories and administrative costs), and the appropriation had not been finally enacted as of the cited documents [3] [4].