Fact check: Which is higher when describing skill level, Master or Elite?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, there is no definitive comparison between "Master" and "Elite" skill levels. None of the provided sources directly address the hierarchical relationship between these two specific terms ^[1]. While various ranking and rating systems exist, including Elo ratings, they don't specifically define or compare these particular designations ^{[2] [3]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

• The traditional skill progression hierarchy follows a different pattern: Beginner → Intermediate → Advanced → Expert ^[4]
• Rating systems like Elo are commonly used to measure skill levels, suggesting that numerical ratings might be more precise than categorical terms ^[2]
• The concept of "mastery" is discussed in terms of being able to perform complex tasks independently and teach others ^[4], but this doesn't necessarily correlate with either "Master" or "Elite" designations

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

• The question assumes a direct hierarchical relationship between "Master" and "Elite," when in reality:
• Different organizations, games, or fields might use these terms differently
• The terms might be parallel rather than hierarchical
• Standard skill progression systems don't typically use either term as official designations ^[4]
• The question overlooks the existence of more standardized and widely-accepted skill assessment methods, such as:
• Numerical rating systems like Elo ^[2]
• Traditional four-tier progression systems ^[4]
• Those who benefit from this ambiguity might include:
• Gaming companies and organizations that can create their own ranking systems
• Training programs that can market their own certification levels
• Content creators who can claim various skill-level titles without standardized verification