Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How are 'excepted' employees paid during a federal shutdown (backpay rules) 2018 2019 2023?
Executive Summary
The Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019 requires that federal employees affected by a lapse in appropriations receive retroactive pay for the period of the lapse, with excepted employees paid for work performed at their standard rate as soon as practicable after funding resumes. The law covers lapses beginning on or after December 22, 2018, and was enacted in direct response to the 2018–2019 shutdown; subsequent agency guidance and congressional correspondence through 2025 reflect broad support for retroactive pay but also reveal confusion and disputes about implementation details in later shutdowns [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What advocates and the statute claimed: a clear congressional fix for back pay
Congress passed the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019 to ensure that both furloughed and excepted federal employees receive retroactive compensation for lapses in appropriations beginning December 22, 2018, and going forward. The law mandates that employees required to work during a shutdown be paid at their standard rate for hours worked and that furloughed employees receive pay for the period they were off, with agencies instructed to make those payments at the earliest possible date after the lapse ends [1] [2] [3]. The statute explicitly extends protections to District of Columbia employees and clarifies leave accrual and use rules for excepted workers, thereby establishing a uniform baseline for federal pay treatment during shutdowns [1].
2. How excepted employees are defined and how pay is calculated under the law
The Fair Treatment Act and implementing guidance describe excepted employees as those whose duties are necessary to protect life and property and therefore must continue to work during a lapse; these employees are entitled to pay for hours worked at their standard rate of pay, which includes basic pay and applicable overtime and premium pay under normal compensatory rules. Agencies must determine pay amounts by applying regular pay rules to the actual hours worked during the lapse and convert those calculations into a retroactive payment once appropriations are restored [3] [5] [4]. The guidance emphasizes that excepted status does not create special pay rates; it only preserves normal pay entitlements despite the funding lapse [6].
3. The 2018–2019 shutdown as the trigger and how it informs later events
The 2018–2019 shutdown, which directly prompted the 2019 law, serves as the statutory baseline: any lapse starting on or after December 22, 2018, falls within the statute’s retroactive-pay guarantee, and agencies were required to apply that guarantee to the 2018–2019 event and any subsequent lapses. Implementing documents from 2019 repeat that back pay must be processed at the earliest opportunity, and later summaries and agency guidance through 2023 and beyond reference the 2019 law as the controlling authority for payment to excepted employees who worked through a lapse [1] [7]. This means that, legally, both the 2018–2019 shutdown and later shutdowns beginning after the statute’s effective date are covered by the same statutory rule set [2].
4. Where implementation has generated disagreement: agency guidance and congressional pressure
Despite the statute’s clear text, agency-level guidance and communications have sometimes created confusion about entitlement and timing. Office of Management and Budget and some agency FAQs have been interpreted or updated in ways that suggest differing conclusions about eligibility or timing of retroactive payments; congressional oversight letters in 2025 illustrate Republican and Democratic senators pressing administrations to adhere to the statute and clarify perceived inconsistencies [5] [4]. The presence of OPM and OMB guidance documents and later agency-specific furlough handbooks shows that operational questions—payroll processing windows, inclusion of premium pay elements, and treatment of certain benefit contributions—are subject to administrative interpretation even when the statute establishes a baseline requirement [4] [8].
5. Remaining gaps the statute did not address: contractors and operational timing
The Fair Treatment Act does not extend retroactive pay to contract workers, and multiple analyses and guidance notes highlight that non-federal contractors traditionally do not receive back pay, leaving a recurring gap in financial protection for workers who support government functions. Agencies must also resolve operational constraints: payroll cycles, accrual accounting, and administrative routing affect how soon employees actually receive checks, even though the law requires payment at the earliest possible date after funding is restored [1] [7]. These operational issues, plus the occasional conflicting language in agency FAQs, explain why employees sometimes experience delays or uncertainty despite a statutory right to retroactive compensation.
6. Bottom line — what affected employees can expect and where to look for proof
Excepted employees required to work during a lapse in appropriations are legally entitled to receive retroactive pay for hours worked at their normal pay rates once the shutdown ends, and furloughed employees likewise have a statutory claim to back pay for the furlough period; this framework was codified in January 2019 and has been the controlling rule for any lapse beginning on or after December 22, 2018 [2] [3]. For specifics on timing, payroll calculations, and benefit adjustments, affected employees should consult their agency’s furlough guidance, OPM or OMB implementing guidance, and congressional oversight letters that document any administrative departures from statutory expectations [4] [5].