How does the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program apply to congressional staff, members, and retirees?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Since 2014 Members of Congress and designated congressional staff were moved out of FEHB’s active-employee enrollment and into ACA-created marketplaces for purposes of employer contributions, but they can still enroll in FEHB as retirees if they meet the same statutory annuitant eligibility rules that apply to other federal retirees (5 U.S.C. §8905) [1] [2] [3]. The change reflects an OPM final rule implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requirement that Members and certain staff obtain employer-sponsored coverage through an ACA plan or SHOP exchange, while preserving retirement access to FEHB under the normal federal-annuitant rules [3] [1] [2].
1. What changed and why: the 2014 OPM rule in plain terms
OPM’s 2013–2014 rulemaking responded to the ACA’s mandate that Members and congressional staff receive employer-sponsored insurance through an ACA plan or exchange, and as a result active Members and certain designated staff were no longer permitted to purchase FEHB plans as employees beginning in calendar year 2014; instead, OPM established that employer contributions would follow employees to the District of Columbia’s SHOP exchange (DC SHOP/DC Health Link Small Business Market) if they enroll there [3] [1] [2].
2. Active Members and staff today: employer contributions and limits
Active Members and designated congressional staff remain eligible for a government employer contribution toward coverage if they enroll in the DC SHOP, but they no longer enroll directly in FEHB as an employment benefit; OPM made explicit that individuals may decline the government contribution and choose other options if they wish [2] [3] [1].
3. Retirement pathway: how Members and staff can access FEHB as annuitants
Those Members and designated staff who become federal annuitants may enroll in FEHB in retirement “provided they meet the eligibility criteria to do so under 5 U.S.C. Section 8905,” and OPM has stated Members and staff will be “subject to the same rules of participation in the FEHB Program in retirement as other Federal annuitants” [2] [3]. Statutory and historical FEHB retirement rules—such as required years of service or prior enrollment conditions that apply to most retirees—therefore govern whether a former Member or staffer can carry FEHB into retirement [4] [5].
4. The substance of eligibility: statutory touchpoints and practical constraints
FEHB’s annuitant eligibility historically has included conditions like retirement on an immediate annuity with specified years of service or disability, plus rules about prior enrollment (for example, provisions dating to the program’s origins and extended in later statutes and CRS summaries), so a congressional retiree must meet the same service, annuity, and prior-enrollment thresholds as other federal retirees to enroll in FEHB [4] [5] [6]. OPM’s guidance and CRS analyses reiterate that there is no special “grandfather” broadening for Members in retirement beyond these standard annuitant criteria [3] [1].
5. Other benefits and program integrity issues that matter
Even after the 2014 change, Members and staff retain access to other federal benefits—such as FEDVIP dental and vision, the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (when available), and programs like FSAFEDS for active employees—because those programs are administered separately from the SHOP/FEHB shift [2] [7] [8]. Meanwhile, oversight reports note broader FEHB program integrity challenges—OPM and GAO findings about family-member verification and fraud risk underscore that enrollment rules and verification processes can affect all FEHB participants, including former Members who enroll as retirees [9].
6. Political debate, transparency and implicit agendas
The policy change has been framed both as compliance with the ACA’s parity rules and as removing a perceived special carve‑out for lawmakers; critics argue transparency about which options Members choose and whether they meet retirement eligibility deserves public scrutiny, while defenders point to OPM’s aim to treat Members and staff like other employees in retirement and to avoid creating broader exchange advantages for annuitants [3] [1] [2]. Stakeholders’ agendas diverge: oversight advocates emphasize uniform rules and verification [9], legislative staff argue procedural parity and program continuity [2] [7], and some political narratives conflate active‑employee coverage choices with retiree entitlements despite the statutory separation [3].
7. Bottom line
Active Members and many designated staff no longer enroll in FEHB as employees but can receive an employer contribution toward DC SHOP coverage; upon retirement, they may enroll in FEHB only if they satisfy the same annuitant eligibility criteria that govern all federal retirees under 5 U.S.C. §8905 and related FEHB statute and precedent—there is no special, broader FEHB entitlement for former Members or staff beyond those standard rules [2] [3] [1] [4].