Which us state agencies have contracted to palantir?
Executive summary
Palantir’s documented public-sector footprint is broad but skewed toward federal and local law‑enforcement clients: major federal agencies including ICE, the Department of Defense, DHS and several health agencies appear across reporting as Palantir customers, and local police departments such as the NYPD and LAPD have used its Gotham platform [1] [2] [3] [4]. Available sources describe “state clients” and state‑level use in general terms but do not provide a definitive, itemized list of every U.S. state agency that has contracted with Palantir; reporting therefore permits identification of many federal and municipal contracts but is incomplete for state governments specifically [3] [5].
1. Federal agencies most frequently named as Palantir customers
Reporting repeatedly names U.S. federal departments that have contracted Palantir: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has longstanding, high‑value contracts and systems such as ICM and ImmigrationOS built with Palantir technology [6] [1], the Department of Defense has multi‑hundred‑million to billion‑dollar engagements [1] [2], and Department of Homeland Security components are cited as users as the company expands into civilian federal work [7] [2].
2. Health, tax and diplomatic agencies — Palantir beyond security and policing
Multiple sources report Palantir work with civilian federal agencies: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department/Agency components within Health and Human Services have been described as using Foundry or piloting integrations [7] [8] [3], while Palantir itself and watchdogs cite longstanding engagements with the Internal Revenue Service and the State Department for investigative, compliance and employee‑safety applications [9] [3].
3. Local police and municipal uses that are publicized
Journalistic and advocacy reporting identifies municipal police agencies among Palantir customers: the New York Police Department and Los Angeles Police Department are mentioned repeatedly in analyses of Gotham’s deployment for investigative work, and organizations tracking surveillance tools list New Orleans Police Department as a reported user [3] [4] [5]. These accounts illustrate how Palantir’s intelligence tooling has migrated from federal to domestic law‑enforcement contexts.
4. Ambiguity around “state agencies” and limitations of the public record
While several pieces refer to “state clients” or state‑level projects, the sources do not assemble a comprehensive roster of U.S. state government agencies with signed contracts; summaries and advocacy pieces emphasize federal and municipal examples and name agencies like ICE, DoD, CDC, IRS and specific police departments rather than enumerating state health, public safety or administrative agencies by state [3] [2] [5]. Therefore, any claim listing all U.S. state agencies that have contracted Palantir would exceed what these sources substantiate.
5. Why the record looks the way it does — incentives, secrecy and spin
The mix of federal transparency (contract filings, high‑profile programs like ImmigrationOS) and proprietary/embedded technical work (forward‑deployed engineers, platform integrations) means Palantir engagements often surface as isolated case studies rather than tidy public inventories; Palantir’s own communications emphasize federal customers such as DoD, NIH, CDC and State while critics and civil‑liberties groups focus on ICE and local police deployments—each side frames the same facts to support different agendas about national security, efficiency or civil‑liberties risk [10] [2] [4].
6. Bottom line and what’s missing from reporting
Confirmed, repeatedly reported U.S. customers in the available sources include ICE, the Department of Defense, DHS elements, the CDC/HHS sphere, the IRS and municipal police departments like NYPD and LAPD [6] [1] [7] [3] [9] [4], but a systematic, source‑verified list of U.S. state (i.e., governor‑level or state agency) contracting across all 50 states is not provided by the cited materials; further investigation would require state contract registries, freedom‑of‑information requests, or Palantir’s contract disclosures to compile a complete inventory [3] [5].