Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Which government services and agencies are most affected by a shutdown?

Checked on October 29, 2025
Searched for:
"US government services agencies most affected by a shutdown"
"federal services impacted by government shutdown 2024"
"which agencies close during federal shutdown"
"services that continue during a shutdown (social security"
"military"
"TSA"
"air traffic control)"
Found 21 sources

Executive Summary

The shutdown has forced widespread furloughs and unpaid work across large swaths of the federal workforce, hitting frontline public-facing programs and discretionary agencies hardest while leaving some mandatory-benefit programs running on schedule. Agencies that provide direct public services—national parks, many regulatory agencies, parts of HHS, HUD, EPA and large swaths of the civilian Pentagon workforce—have seen closures, furloughs or layoffs, while core national security, law enforcement and entitlement payments continue to operate but with operational strain [1] [2] [3]. This analysis maps the biggest disruptions, quantifies workforce effects, and highlights where service continuity creates hidden vulnerabilities and political debate [4] [5].

1. Who’s Suddenly on the Sidelines—and Why That Matters for Daily Life

Many agencies that provide visible public services are the first to feel budget lapses because Congress funds them annually and those funds lapse in a shutdown. National parks, Smithsonian museums, federal grant programs tied to HUD and Education, portions of HHS programs, and regulatory units in EPA and smaller agencies have experienced closures or pauses in regular operations, producing immediate, tangible impacts for constituents and local economies [6] [1] [7]. These closures matter beyond inconvenience: they interrupt inspections, grant processing, and community services that local governments and nonprofits rely on. That dynamic creates pressure on affected constituencies to lobby for quick resolutions, and it exposes uneven visibility of harm—programs with low public profile can suffer quietly, compounding downstream effects for housing, public health, and environmental enforcement [1] [8].

2. The Federal Workforce: Furloughs, Working Without Pay, and Financial Strain

The shutdown reshuffles the federal workforce into furloughed employees, those required to work without pay, and a smaller group whose funding is protected by mandatory programs. Roughly 1.4 million federal employees have been affected in the current episode, with many receiving reduction-in-force notices or facing layoffs in some agencies [4] [1]. The Department of Defense has furloughed nearly half of some civilian workforces in certain components, and air traffic controllers and TSA screeners face the extreme burden of working without immediate pay, which creates acute financial stress, recruitment risks, and potential long-term operational consequences [3] [9]. Unpaid workforces quickly translate into personal financial crises for families and reduced morale, which can affect retention and the continuity of institutional expertise over time [5] [10].

3. Entitlements and “Essential” Services: Payments Continue, But Operations Strain

Several large mandatory programs continue to issue benefits, shielding recipients from immediate payment interruptions: Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid payments, SNAP and certain USDA nutrition programs continue, and the USPS operates under separate financing, preserving mail delivery and benefits mailings [8] [11] [7]. The Social Security Administration has confirmed payments and online services remain available, though some administrative functions like benefit verifications may slow [11] [12]. That operational continuity masks stress: agencies processing claims, appeals, and verifications have reduced staff, producing backlogs and delayed administrative responses that can affect access to care, eligibility reviews, or provider reimbursements later—even when benefit checks arrive on schedule [12] [8].

4. Aviation and Transportation: Safety Work Continues but Service Degrades

Air traffic controllers, TSA screeners, and other transportation safety personnel are designated “excepted” and must work through a lapse, often without immediate pay. That continuity preserves core safety functions but has already correlated with increased delays and missed paychecks, straining morale and highlighting resiliency limits in essential systems [9] [5]. The FAA reports staffing-related delays and unions warn of long-term harm if controllers operate without pay for extended periods; airline schedules and passenger experience thereby become early visible indicators of systemic stress [13] [5]. The paradox is that keeping personnel on duty protects safety but accelerates workforce fatigue and retention risks, forcing policymakers to weigh short-term safety guarantees against the long-term health of the system [9].

5. Military, Veterans, and Health Programs: Mixed Continuity and Localized Hardship

Defense operations and active-duty military functions continue, but civilian defense staff and military families face disruptions: civilian furloughs in defense lead to gaps in logistics, family support services, and pay uncertainty for some dependents and civilian contractors [10] [14]. VA payments and education benefits have faced uncertainty in recent reporting, with tens of thousands of students and veterans potentially affected if administrative functions pause [14]. Health-related programs administered by HHS continue for critical care and hospital operations, but public-health activities, research funding, and regulatory enforcement can be delayed, threatening long-term public-health responses and scientific continuity [1] [2]. These mixed outcomes create uneven risks: frontline care is protected, while prevention, oversight, and benefits-admin functions are vulnerable.

6. The Politics and the Hidden Tradeoffs Policymakers Overlook

Decisions to designate “excepted” personnel create clear winners and losers: law enforcement, border protection, and entitlement recipients are prioritized while regulatory enforcement, research, and many grant-dependent programs are paused, reflecting political and legal judgments about what is essential [2] [15]. Stakeholders push narratives to protect their interests—unions emphasize worker pay and safety risks, agencies highlight public-harm from paused functions, and political actors frame impacts to mobilize constituencies. These competing agendas influence which programs receive stopgap fixes and reveal that service continuity during shutdowns is unevenly distributed, producing both immediate hardship and deferred costs that may be harder to quantify and resolve afterward [4] [16].

Want to dive deeper?
What federal agencies are typically fully furloughed during a U.S. government shutdown and which are exempt?
How are Social Security payments, Medicare, and Medicaid affected during a federal shutdown?
What happens to national parks, passport and visa processing, and IRS services during a shutdown?
How do federal law enforcement, the military, and essential public safety functions operate during a shutdown?
What are the economic impacts of past federal shutdowns on federal contractors, grant programs, and state services?