Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who are 'excepted' federal employees paid during a government shutdown?
Executive Summary
Two legal realities are clear: federal law requires that both excepted employees who work during a lapse in appropriations and furloughed employees receive retroactive pay once appropriations resume, and agencies classify who is “excepted” based on mission-critical work such as protection of life and property. Reporting since late October and early November 2025 documents widespread confusion over who is working without pay, with about 730,000 federal workers required to work without immediate pay in the current lapse and many agencies operating under shifting contingency plans [1] [2]. This analysis reconciles those claims, identifies gaps in public explanations, and flags institutional and political drivers behind conflicting statements about pay and exceptions [3] [4].
1. Who counts as “excepted” — the law vs. daily agency decisions that create confusion
The legal framework directs agencies to designate employees as excepted when their duties are necessary to protect human life or property or otherwise authorized to continue during a funding lapse; those employees must work without pay until Congress acts and receive retroactive pay after appropriations resume [5] [2]. Agencies, however, exercise significant discretion when applying those criteria, producing variable lists across departments and even among bureaus, which explains why the State Department reports roughly 62% of its workforce excepted in this shutdown while other agencies furlough larger shares [1] [6]. The practical result is a patchwork in which the same occupational categories—passport adjudicators, air traffic controllers, law enforcement, health responders—may be treated differently depending on internal contingency plans and interpretations of Office of Management and Budget and Department of Justice guidance [5] [7].
2. What pay rules actually say—and where political statements have diverged from statutory language
Congress enacted the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act in 2019 to ensure that both excepted workers who perform services during a shutdown and furloughed employees receive back pay after a lapse ends; the statute requires agencies to pay excepted employees for work performed at their standard rate as soon as feasible following restoration of funding [3] [4]. Yet public messaging from some administrations has implied that only those who work will be paid or that exceptions depend on nonstatutory funding streams, creating a misleading contrast with the statute’s retroactivity guarantee [3]. The discrepancy stems partly from short-term cash-flow and appropriations maneuvers—such as reallocations for military pay—that affect the timing and perception of who receives paychecks during the lapse even though the legal entitlement to retroactive wages remains intact [2].
3. Scale and examples — who is working without pay right now and why that matters
Current reporting in late October and early November 2025 indicates roughly 730,000 federal employees are working without pay, including frontline components like passport adjudicators, air-traffic controllers, TSA screeners, and large swaths of the State Department and Defense forces; simultaneously, about 670,000 employees are furloughed [1] [2]. Agencies have relied on the “excepted” designation to keep critical services running—often without immediate compensation—because the legal test focuses on mission consequences rather than budget categorizations. The consequences are material: fee-funded operations that appear self-sustaining have still been curtailed or forced to operate without pay due to broader appropriations gaps, producing operational strain and public confusion about which services remain available [1] [2].
4. Political pressures and legislation shaping who gets paid sooner or later
Legislative and executive responses during the 2025 lapse have introduced political choices that complicate statutory entitlements: Congress and the White House have at times proposed or enacted stopgap measures or targeted transfers to cover certain pay dates—most notably actions to secure active-duty military pay—that affect short-term liquidity but do not alter the statute’s retroactive-pay requirement [2] [8]. Political actors have also introduced bills to expedite or limit back pay to specific categories (for example, recent Senate proposals focused on excepted employees only), revealing an agenda-driven calculus about who should be prioritized and how the public perceives fairness during a shutdown [8] [3]. Those moves can provide immediate relief for particular groups while leaving the underlying legal guarantee unchanged.
5. Bottom line: legal entitlement exists, but implementation and optics drive disputes
The bottom-line synthesis from the sources is that federal law mandates retroactive pay for excepted and furloughed employees alike once appropriations are restored, yet agency discretion, funding logistics, and political statements create persistent confusion and uneven short-term outcomes for workers and services [4] [5]. The practical difference between being “excepted” and “furloughed” lies in duty status during the lapse—working without pay versus temporarily released from duty—not in entitlement to back pay. Readers should therefore treat claims that only certain employees “will be paid” during a shutdown as incomplete or misleading absent clarification of timing, statutory retroactivity, and recent legislative or executive maneuvers that affect pay timing [3] [2].