Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

How does 14 cm penis girth compare to global averages and percentiles?

Checked on November 14, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A 14.0 cm erect circumference (girth) is larger than commonly reported global averages: the widely cited 2015 systematic review gives an average erect circumference of 11.66 cm, so 14 cm is roughly 2.3 cm above that mean [1]. Available sources do not give a single, universally published percentile for a 14 cm girth, but multiple data summaries and calculators (Veale review, calcSD and related reporting) show girth distributions are narrow — meaning 14 cm would place above the median and likely well above the 75th percentile in most published datasets [1] [2] [3].

1. What the best peer-reviewed summary says about average girth

The most-cited systematic review of measured penis size (combining many studies and thousands of men) reports an average erect circumference of 11.66 cm (4.59 in) — that is the benchmark most journalists and scientists cite when discussing global averages [1] [4]. Science reporting based on that review emphasizes the distribution is relatively tight (not many extreme outliers), which matters when assessing how far from “average” a given measurement lies [5].

2. How percentiles are usually derived and why girth percentiles are less publicized

Researchers convert pooled means and standard deviations into percentile curves; reporting tends to focus on length more than girth. News pieces and the nomograms from the large review translate length into percentiles (e.g., 16 cm erect length ≈ 95th percentile), but reporting on girth percentiles is sparser in mainstream summaries — though the same statistical logic applies: narrow standard deviation -> smaller changes in cm shift percentile rank noticeably [4] [5]. Calculators and niche sites that repurpose the pooled distributions will estimate a girth percentile for you [2] [6].

3. What 14 cm erect girth implies relative to reported averages

Compared to the 11.66 cm mean from the large, measured-review, 14 cm is about 19% greater than that mean (14.00 vs. 11.66 cm) — a nontrivial difference given girth’s tighter spread [1]. Because girth varies less than length, a 2–3 cm jump above the mean typically moves a measurement from the 50th into the upper quartile or beyond in many reported datasets; niche percentile calculators and community charts reflect that upward displacement [2] [3].

4. What the published articles and calculators actually say about percentiles

The Veale et al. review and major news coverage provide examples for length percentiles (e.g., 16 cm length ≈ 95th percentile) and note that distributions are bell-shaped and compact; explicit published girth-percentile cutoffs are less often printed in mainstream summaries [5] [4]. Independent calculators (calcSD and derivatives) use pooled means and SDs to estimate percentiles for girth, and their user tools will place a 14 cm girth above the median — though exact percentile outputs depend on the dataset and assumptions used [2] [6] [3].

5. Caveats and limitations in the data you should know

Not all studies measure the same way (some measure at base vs. mid-shaft), and many older or convenience-sample studies relied on self-report rather than measurements by clinicians, which biases averages upward or downward depending on method; the 2015 review restricted to clinician-measured data to improve consistency [1] [4]. National or regional studies show some variation — for example, individual country or clinic series report different central values — so a percentile derived from one pooled global dataset may not match a specific population’s distribution [7] [8].

6. Practical takeaways and how to get a precise percentile

If you want a concrete percentile for 14 cm girth, use a calculator based on measured-data nomograms (calcSD and similar tools) or a dataset that specifies girth percentiles; those tools transform the pooled mean and SD into a percentile estimate [2] [6]. Remember that the authoritative pooled mean most journalists and scientists quote is 11.66 cm erect circumference [1], and given the narrow spread of girth, 14 cm will consistently rank noticeably above average in available reporting [1] [5].

Sources and methods note: This answer relies on the 2015 measured-data systematic review and subsequent media summaries (Veale et al. as reported in Wikipedia, LA Times and Science/AAAS), plus online percentile calculators and study-level reports that implement those distributions [1] [4] [5] [2] [6]. Available sources do not provide a single authoritative percentile number for exactly 14 cm girth without running a specific calculator on a stated dataset [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the global average and median penis girth measurements by country?
How are penis girth percentiles calculated and what does the 50th, 90th, and 95th percentile correspond to in centimeters?
What sample sizes and measurement methods are used in major penis size studies and how do they affect estimates?
Are there health or sexual-function correlations associated with larger or smaller penis girth measurements?
How reliable are self-reported penis size surveys versus clinical measurements and which datasets are most trustworthy?