Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there special ABAWD exemptions for those receiving SSDI, SSI, or participating in disability-related programs?
Executive summary
Federal SNAP rules reinstate stricter ABAWD work/time limits beginning November 1, 2025, requiring roughly 80 hours/month of work, training, or volunteering to avoid the three‑month-in-36‑month benefit limit for able‑bodied adults without dependents; some disability‑related exemptions and individual determinations still exist, but the administration and scope of exemptions are tightening and states must re‑screen recipients [1] [2] [3].
1. What the new nationwide ABAWD enforcement actually does
Beginning November 1, 2025, USDA guidance directs states to more uniformly apply the ABAWD time‑limit and work‑participation framework, with a standard expectation of about 80 hours per month of work, training, or verified volunteering to avoid counting months toward the three‑in‑36 limit [1] [2]. States previously using broad geographic waivers or pandemic-era pauses are being told to narrow or end those waivers; some localized waivers and discretionary exemptions remain but are constrained by the new federal direction [1] [2].
2. Where SSDI and SSI recipients fit in: explicit exemptions exist in state guidance
Multiple state SNAP pages and manuals list recipients of disability benefits — including Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) — among recognized exemption categories from ABAWD work requirements or time limits (examples: Florida DCF, NY OTDA, Erie County guidance) [4] [3] [5]. Those sources show that being a current SSI recipient or receiving SSDI is a commonly identified reason to be excused from ABAWD rules [3] [4] [5].
3. But “automatic” or blanket exemptions are being narrowed in practice
Reporting and state notices emphasize that federal law changes in 2025 remove some prior blanket waivers and require states to re‑screen and document exemptions; one explainer says the OBBBA (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) removes automatic exemptions for some groups starting November 2025 and increases documentation or verification requirements [6] [1]. In short: being a disability applicant/recipient remains a valid exemption in many jurisdictions, but states will apply stricter screening and documentation regimes [6] [1].
4. States retain discretion and process differences — read your local rules
States have historically implemented ABAWD exemptions and waivers differently and will continue to have some discretion about case‑by‑case discretionary exemptions, area waivers, and administrative processes; for example, Florida’s and Missouri’s guidance both list disability recipients as exempt but outline procedures for medical determinations and local screening [4] [7]. Washington, Arizona, New York and other states publish their own operational rules and timelines, so a person’s experience can vary by state and county [8] [9] [10] [3].
5. Medical determinations and non‑benefit disability findings matter
Manuals and guidance note that someone not formally qualifying as “disabled” for SSDI/SSI can still be found unable to meet work/training requirements after a medical evaluation; states may use medical review teams or require medical professional statements to determine ABAWD exemption status (Missouri DSS manual example) [7]. That means simply applying for SSI/SSDI or being denied a disability award does not itself settle the ABAWD exemption question — states may run separate functional assessments [7].
6. What to do if you or someone you know is in this situation
State SNAP pages advise individuals to contact their local SNAP office promptly to report SSI/SSDI status, submit documentation, and ask for a formal exemption determination (New York OTDA suggests calling local district contacts) [3]. Because states will be re‑screening and verifying participation or exemptions after November 2025, timely documentation and recordkeeping are essential [3] [8].
7. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in sources
Federal and many state sources frame the change as enforcement of long‑standing statutory limits and improved consistency (USDA reporting and explanatory pieces), while advocacy‑oriented explainers warn the tighter rules and removal of automatic waivers will reduce benefits for many and place new administrative burdens on vulnerable people (coverage referencing OBBBA and estimate ranges) [1] [6] [2]. State pages that emphasize documentation and medical review reflect a bureaucratic agenda: reduce improper exemptions while controlling caseloads; nonprofit explainers tend to emphasize risk to beneficiaries and operational gaps [6] [2].
Limitations and what’s not in these sources: available sources do not outline a single, nation‑wide list enumerating every circumstance where SSI/SSDI recipients are automatically excused — instead, the sources show common exemption categories, state operational differences, and an overall federal tightening starting November 2025 [1] [3] [4] [7]. For specific cases, consult your state’s SNAP/OTDA or local district office listed on state guidance [3] [8].