Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the projected healthcare coverage losses due to ACA cuts in 2025?
Executive Summary
The available analyses present a range of projected coverage losses tied to 2025 policy changes and proposed ACA-related cuts: short-term estimates tied to expiration of enhanced premium tax credits point to roughly 4.8–5.0 million people losing Marketplace subsidies and becoming uninsured in 2026, while broader Medicaid rollbacks or large package cuts are projected to put hundreds of thousands to as many as 16 million people at risk of losing coverage depending on the policy scenario analyzed. Mortality and financial harm estimates linked to these coverage losses vary widely across studies, with annual excess deaths estimates ranging from the low hundreds to tens of thousands and catastrophic out-of-pocket exposure counted in the hundreds of thousands to hundreds of thousands annually [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. Startling Numbers: Marketplace Subsidy Expiration Would Immediately Shift Millions into Uninsured Status
Analysts focused on the expiration of enhanced premium tax credits uniformly estimate a near-term, sharp increase in the uninsured by roughly 4.8 million people in 2026, with correspondingly steeper premiums for lower-income enrollees and substantially worse affordability for those under 250 percent of the federal poverty level. The September 2025 brief quantifies this scenario and highlights that average net premiums for subsidized enrollees could rise by more than fourfold for some low-income groups, producing a large and immediate shock to Marketplace enrollment and affordability that would disproportionately affect low- and moderate-income households and likely increase the uninsured rate by about 21 percent [1]. This projection isolates the effect of policy expiration rather than broader legislative rollbacks, showing how targeted fiscal changes to subsidies can have a concentrated and measurable coverage impact.
2. Bigger Cuts, Broader Consequences: Medicaid Reductions Could Add Millions More to the Uninsured
Analyses of proposed Medicaid funding cuts and comprehensive budget proposals present wider, less precise ranges: several studies and advocacy letters forecast increases in the uninsured numbering from 600,000 up to 3.9 million from specific Medicaid cut packages, while broader legislative packages such as the “One Big Beautiful Bill” are claimed by signatories to risk 16 million losing coverage—numbers driven by combinations of eligibility changes, per-capita caps, or work requirements [2] [3]. The divergence arises because different analyses use distinct policy assumptions—some model single statutory changes, others model combined legislative proposals—so the scale of projected coverage loss depends directly on which provisions are enacted and how states respond. Policy design details therefore matter massively for the final coverage outcome.
3. The Human Toll: Mortality and Catastrophic Costs Diverge Across Studies
Estimates of health outcomes tied to coverage losses diverge sharply. A June 2025 modeling exercise connects long-term ACA rollback scenarios to tens of thousands of excess deaths annually by 2034 and attributes portions of those deaths to Medicaid and Marketplace coverage loss as well as to other regulatory rollbacks, including nursing-home staffing rule reversals [4]. Other studies focused on Medicaid rollback impacts estimate hundreds to low thousands of medically preventable deaths annually depending on cut magnitude, while a Lancet analysis quantifies roughly 14,660 excess deaths over one year associated with the loss of Medicaid in expansion states for the 25–64 age group—findings that underscore the sensitivity of mortality estimates to modeling choices, populations studied, and time horizons [2] [5]. Different assumptions about healthcare utilization and baseline mortality drive these wide ranges.
4. Economic Pain Beyond Insurance: Premiums, Out-of-Pocket Risk, and State Budgets
Coverage loss projections are accompanied by projections of financial harm: loss of subsidies or Medicaid expansion is modeled to increase the number of people facing catastrophic health-care costs by hundreds of thousands annually and to drive average Marketplace benchmark premiums higher, with observed year-over-year premium increases already reported between 2024 and 2025 in some analyses. A June 2025 marketplace report documented a 5.8 percent rise in the average benchmark premium between 2024 and 2025, illustrating that affordability pressures predate and would amplify under subsidy expirations or Medicaid contractions [6]. States would also face fiscal strain from shifting costs and potential uncompensated care increases—the fiscal and financial dimensions compound the public-health impacts.
5. Why Projections Differ and What to Watch Next
The studies disagree because they analyze different policy levers, time frames, and geographic scopes: some isolate the premium tax credit expiration, others simulate Medicaid rollbacks across all expansion states, and advocacy estimates bundle multiple program cuts into a single headline number. Publication dates matter; near-term briefs (September 2025) emphasize immediate subsidy expiration effects, while June 2025 modeling explores longer-term, cumulative outcomes through 2034 [1] [4]. Policymakers and analysts should therefore track three variables to reconcile projections: the specific statutory changes enacted, state-level responses (work requirements, continuous coverage choices, or expanded outreach), and updated empirical enrollment and premium data in the months after any policy change—those three factors will determine whether the higher-end or lower-end projections materialize [2].