Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs change after the ACA for individual market enrollees?
Executive Summary
The assembled analyses converge on a clear finding: individual-market premiums and out-of-pocket costs are forecast to rise materially after recent ACA-era policy shifts, driven largely by the lapse or rollback of enhanced subsidies and rising underlying health-care costs. Projections in 2025–2026 show median proposed premium hikes near 18–20% and much larger increases for subsidized households if enhanced tax credits expire, with estimates ranging from ~75% to more than 100% in average premium payments for affected enrollees [1] [2] [3].
1. Bold Claims: How big are the headline increases and who made them?
Multiple analyses present overlapping numeric claims about near-term cost changes for individual-market enrollees. The insurer rate-filing analysis reports a median proposed premium increase of about 18% and an average of about 20% for 2026 filings, with insurers pointing to drug prices, labor, and inflation as primary drivers [1]. Other summaries project much larger consumer-facing impacts if enhanced premium tax credits expire: estimates range from a roughly 75% jump in average premiums to a 114% rise in average out-of-pocket premium payments for subsidized enrollees, depending on income and policy scenarios [2] [3]. A recent Johns Hopkins piece frames worst-case localized increases up to 59% tied to subsidy expirations, signaling broad agreement that subsidy policy is the single largest swing factor [4].
2. Deeper context: What’s driving the increases beyond subsidy politics?
The analyses consistently identify underlying health-care cost inflation—including high-priced prescription drugs, labor costs, and general medical price growth—as an important independent driver of higher premiums cited in insurer filings [1]. These structural cost pressures predate the post-ACA subsidy debates and reflect decades-long trends in U.S. health spending. The policy environment—especially the status of enhanced premium tax credits and regulatory changes such as the Marketplace Integrity and Affordability rule—interacts with these baseline cost trends, amplifying impacts on both premiums and enrollee cost-sharing [1] [3]. Analysts warn that enrollment composition changes, with healthier people leaving if costs climb, could create feedback loops that further raise premiums, a classic adverse-selection concern described across the briefings [4] [5].
3. Who loses coverage and how many could be pushed out?
Forecasts in these sources estimate millions of people could exit Marketplace coverage if subsidies are curtailed. One analysis projects over 11 million fewer marketplace enrollees and roughly 7 million becoming uninsured under certain policy scenarios tied to subsidy expiration and rule changes [3]. Other summaries warn that new eligibility and enrollment restrictions—such as limits for certain lawfully present immigrants and fewer year-round sign-up options—could reduce enrollment further and push cost-sensitive individuals toward high-deductible bronze or catastrophic plans, increasing out-of-pocket exposure for those who remain [2] [5].
4. Out-of-pocket burdens: numbers and implications for families
Beyond premiums, the analyses highlight meaningful rises in out-of-pocket exposure. One projection shows individual annual out-of-pocket costs rising from about $9,200 in 2025 to $10,600 in 2026, a roughly 15% increase in maximums and total exposure driven by insurer shifts to higher deductibles and more cost-sharing flexibility [5] [3]. When combined with higher premium contributions—particularly for middle-income households no longer fully insulated by enhanced tax credits—the cumulative financial burden on families could be substantial, affecting access to care and financial stability for those with chronic conditions or high health needs [5] [1].
5. Disagreements, uncertainties, and the timing of the final numbers
While the direction of change is consistent, the magnitude varies across forecasts depending on policy assumptions and whether rate filings are finalized as proposed. Insurer filings for 2026 are described as preliminary and subject to state rate review processes and potential federal policy interventions; therefore, final premiums could differ from the proposed median increases [1]. Some sources stress that the sharpest consumer impacts hinge explicitly on whether enhanced premium tax credits expire—a political outcome not finalized at the time of these analyses—so projections that assume expiration show far larger shocks than those that assume continuation [5] [3].
6. Takeaway for consumers and policymakers: choices matter now
The combined evidence underscores that policy choices over premium tax credits and marketplace rules are the decisive lever shaping whether the ACA’s individual market remains affordable for most enrollees. Absent continued subsidies, expect both higher premiums and greater out-of-pocket exposure, with attendant enrollment declines and possible coverage losses for millions; conversely, maintaining or replacing enhanced credits would materially blunt predicted increases [2] [1] [3]. Policymakers, state regulators, and consumers face tradeoffs among fiscal cost, insurer solvency, and population-level access—decisions that will determine whether the individual market holds or fractures in 2026 [4] [3].