Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What changes to ACA subsidies are expected in 2026?
Executive Summary
The core change expected for Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies in 2026 is the potential expiry of the temporary, enhanced premium tax credits that expanded eligibility and increased subsidy generosity through 2025; if Congress does not act, most enrollees will face substantially higher out-of-pocket premium costs, a return of the “subsidy cliff” above 400% of the federal poverty level, and reduced marketplace enrollment [1] [2] [3]. Analyses estimate average subsidized enrollee premiums could more than double or rise roughly 70–114% on average, producing large variation by income and family composition and possibly causing millions to lose coverage or become uninsured [4] [5] [6].
1. Why the 2026 “Subsidy Cliff” Is the Big Story and Who It Hits Hardest
The defining issue for 2026 is the scheduled end of the enhanced Premium Tax Credit (PTC) after 2025 unless Congress extends or replaces it; this reversion would reinstate pre-enhancement rules that limit subsidies to those under 400% of the federal poverty level and tighten affordability caps, producing a sharp loss of assistance for middle-income households and reinstating coverage gaps known as the “subsidy cliff” [3] [1]. Analysts warn that 92% of marketplace enrollees benefited from the enhancements and that many of those above the 400% threshold or in the middle-income bands will see the largest percentage increases in net premiums, creating disparate impacts across states and family types [7] [8]. The end result is projected to increase financial strain and widen disparities in access to employer-like marketplace coverage [5] [9].
2. How Large the Premium Increases Could Be — Competing Estimates and Their Drivers
Estimates vary but consistently show large premium shocks if enhancements expire: KFF-based analysis projects subsidized enrollee payments could more than double (an average increase from $888 to $1,904, a 114% jump) in 2026 absent extension, while other modeling points to 70–75% average increases or even household-specific increases exceeding $20,000 for some families depending on health needs and plan choice [4] [2] [7]. Differences in these figures reflect modeling choices — whether analyses account for changes in the risk pool (sicker people remaining), state-level market dynamics, or behavioral responses like enrollment churn — but all sources agree substantial increases are likely and will vary widely by income and household composition [2] [4] [9].
3. Enrollment and Insurance Coverage Effects: Millions at Risk
Analysts consistently project enrollment fallout if enhanced credits lapse: some studies estimate up to 4 million people could lose marketplace coverage and join the uninsured, while other commentary warns of broader instability and higher pre-subsidy premiums driven by adverse selection [5] [6] [1]. The Congressional Budget Office and budget-focused groups note that allowing the enhancements to expire would reduce federal outlays and enrollment — a predictable fiscal outcome — whereas extending them would raise federal costs but preserve or increase enrollment [1] [8]. These dynamics underline a trade-off policymakers face between near-term budget impact and maintaining coverage levels across the health system [1] [5].
4. Policy Choices on the Table and Their Fiscal Implications
Policy options are straightforward: Congress can extend, modify, or let the enhanced PTC expire. Budget analyses estimate a cost of roughly $350 billion over a decade to make the enhancements permanent, while allowing expiration reduces federal spending and shrinks exchange enrollment [8] [1]. Stakeholders differ in emphasis: proponents of extension highlight coverage preservation and affordability for millions of enrollees, while opponents highlight fiscal costs and argue for targeting or different subsidy designs. The reconciliation law P.L. 119-21 is referenced by analyses as potentially relevant to PTC provisions, though details and ultimate budgetary trade-offs remain central to legislative negotiations [1] [8].
5. What to Watch and Practical Impacts for Consumers Entering 2026
For individuals and families, the immediate implications are clear: if enhancements lapse, expect materially higher premiums, narrower affordability protections for middle incomes, and greater instability during open enrollment; some households could face increases exceeding thousands of dollars annually, and marketplace plan choices may shift as risk pools change [2] [7] [9]. Observers advise preparing during 2025 open enrollment for potential changes in subsidy eligibility and premium cost-sharing, while policymakers weigh whether to act before the lapse to avoid a large-scale disruption in coverage and spikes in consumer costs [9] [5]. The differing estimates underscore both the magnitude of the risk and the importance of legislative clarity for consumers.