What happens to ACA subsidies and premiums if the ARPA/IRA enhancements expire after 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
If Congress allows the ARPA/IRA enhancements to lapse after 2025, the core premium tax credit (PTC) will remain but the expanded eligibility and larger subsidies will end — meaning subsidies would revert to their pre‑ARPA rules (a 400% of FPL cap and higher “applicable percentages”), driving substantially higher net premiums for many Marketplace enrollees and likely reducing coverage [1] [2]. Independent analyses project large consumer impacts: average annual premium payments for subsidized enrollees would more than double and millions could become uninsured without an extension or other offsetting policies [3] [4].
1. What legally changes on Jan 1, 2026: the credit stays, the enhancements don’t
The statutory premium tax credit itself has no sunset; Congress created the enhanced structure under ARPA and extended it through 2025 via the IRA, but the temporary elements — expanded eligibility above 400% of the federal poverty line (FPL) and the reduced income share people must pay — are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025, returning the subsidy formula to its pre‑ARPA parameters on January 1, 2026 [1] [2].
2. Direct effects on subsidies and who loses them
Operationally, expiration reinstates the 400% FPL cliff and raises the “applicable percentage” table so households at any given income would receive smaller premium tax credits than in 2025; those with incomes above 400% FPL would no longer be eligible for subsidies at all under the old rules [2] [1]. The result is higher out‑of‑pocket premiums for lower‑ and middle‑income enrollees and total loss of assistance for the previously subsidized higher‑income enrollees [2] [5].
3. How large the premium and coverage shocks look in the models
Quantitative estimates from reputable analysts show substantial dislocation: KFF estimates that the average annual premium payment for subsidized enrollees would rise from about $888 in 2025 to roughly $1,904 in 2026 — a 114% increase — if enhanced credits expire, while Urban Institute projections suggest as many as 4.8 million more adults could become uninsured in 2026 under expiration scenarios [3] [4]. These analyses reflect the large enrollment gains achieved while the enhancements were in place and the exposure created by their sunset [4] [6].
4. Market and fiscal ripple effects — winners, losers, and the political choices
A lapse would shift costs onto consumers, providers, and potentially state budgets that subsidize coverage, with insurers and state marketplaces facing enrollment churn and premium re‑rating uncertainty [2] [3]. Lawmakers weighing whether to extend or make enhancements permanent must reconcile the near‑term affordability gains against long‑run federal spending increases documented in CBO/JCT estimates when the ARPA/IRA provisions were scored [1] [6]. Political delays and budget signaling have already injected uncertainty into 2026 market planning [5] [7].
5. Offsets, state responses, and the limits of current reporting
Some states already provide their own subsidies, which could blunt premium increases for residents in a handful of states, but national estimates (like KFF’s) explicitly exclude state offsets and therefore may overstate net burdens for those populations [3]. Reporting and models differ in timing and baseline assumptions — for example, higher 2025 enrollment magnifies projected 2026 impacts — and available sources do not fully resolve which congressional path (short extension, permanent fix, or phased rollback) will actually materialize, so final outcomes depend on legislative choices not covered in these sources [4] [5].
Bottom line: big premium increases unless Congress or states act
The legal mechanics are straightforward — the credit remains but the ARPA/IRA enhancements sunset — and modeling consistently finds that expiration would produce materially higher premiums for subsidized enrollees and sizable coverage losses absent legislative or state mitigation, with important fiscal tradeoffs tied to any decision to extend or make the enhancements permanent [1] [3] [4].