Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How would ACA subsidy expiration in 2025 affect health insurance enrollment?
Executive Summary
The expiration of the ACA’s enhanced premium tax credits in 2025 would sharply raise Marketplace premiums and drive substantial enrollment losses, with analyses projecting average premium increases of roughly 100–114% for subsidized enrollees and millions of people losing coverage over the next decade [1] [2]. Projections vary by model and timeframe, but multiple independent analyses estimate between 3.8 million and more than 14 million additional uninsured people over the 2026–2035 period, with the heaviest impacts concentrated among middle-income families, older adults, and residents of certain states [3] [4] [5].
1. Why premiums would surge and who bears the brunt — immediate math and demographic pressure
When the enhanced premium tax credits lapse, the subsidy that reduced enrollees’ monthly premiums disappears, causing out-of-pocket premium obligations to rise sharply. Models commissioned by nonpartisan analysts show average Marketplace premium payments for subsidized enrollees could more than double from roughly $888 in 2025 to about $1,904 in 2026 — a 114% increase — translating into meaningful affordability shocks for about 20 million Americans currently receiving premium tax credits [1] [2]. Those most exposed include the so-called “missing middle” — people who earn too much for Medicaid but do not have employer coverage — as well as people in their 50s and 60s who have higher baseline premiums and tighter budgets, meaning they face larger absolute dollar increases and higher risk of dropping coverage [6] [7].
2. Enrollment fallout — steady erosion versus abrupt loss, and the range of projections
Analyses converge that enrollment would decline, but they differ sharply on scale and timing. Shorter-term projections focus on January 2026 enrollment impacts, estimating tens of millions facing higher premiums and potential market exits, while longer-term modeling ties the subsidy lapse to cumulative increases in the uninsured population ranging from roughly 3.8 million to over 14 million by the mid-2030s, depending on whether other policy changes or economic factors occur [3] [4] [5]. The variance stems from assumptions about behavioral responses — how many will drop coverage vs. seek lower-premium plans or rely on other sources — and differing baseline scenarios for state-level coverage options and Medicaid eligibility.
3. Geographic and equity implications — who stands to lose the most
State-by-state modeling indicates disproportionate impacts: states with higher shares of Marketplace enrollment and fewer alternative affordable coverage options would see the sharpest rises in uninsured rates, with KFF-style analyses highlighting larger increases in states such as Louisiana, Florida, and Arizona under some scenarios [4]. The effects would also be concentrated among lower-income families above Medicaid thresholds, older adults within the Marketplace risk pool, and communities of color that experienced coverage gains during the subsidy expansion; these groups face both higher premium burdens and worse downstream health and financial outcomes if coverage is lost [7] [8].
4. Budgetary and macro implications — federal costs, household strain, and market dynamics
Ending the enhanced credits reduces federal subsidy outlays but shifts costs to households and alters insurer incentives, producing trade-offs between short-term federal savings and long-term fiscal and health costs. Analysts emphasize that household budgets will bear the brunt through higher premiums and potentially greater out-of-pocket spending if coverage lapses or people choose high-deductible plans to control premiums [3] [2]. Market dynamics could include adverse selection, with healthier enrollees opting out and sicker enrollees remaining, pushing premiums higher and potentially destabilizing some local markets absent policy offsets or broad risk-mitigation measures [8].
5. Uncertainties, divergent assumptions, and policy responses that would change outcomes
Projections hinge on key assumptions: whether states expand Medicaid, whether employers adjust offerings, how insurers price risk, and whether policymakers enact replacement subsidies or targeted relief. Some analyses warn of worst-case scenarios with over 14 million newly uninsured by 2034 if offsetting policies are not enacted, while others present lower-range estimates based on partial behavioral adjustments [4] [5]. Any congressional or administrative intervention — from extending enhanced tax credits to targeted subsidies for older enrollees or state-level solutions — would materially alter the enrollment and fiscal outcomes laid out in these models [3] [6].
6. Bottom line for stakeholders — what consumers, states, and policymakers should expect next
For consumers, the immediate takeaway is that many current Marketplace enrollees could face unaffordable premiums and disruption in 2026 absent legislative action, increasing the risk of coverage loss and financial strain [1] [2]. For states and insurers, expectations of enrollment churn and potential market destabilization should prompt contingency planning and consideration of state-level mitigations. For lawmakers, the range of credible projections — millions uninsured and doubling premiums for subsidized enrollees — presents a clear policy choice between allowing the subsidy cliff to proceed or adopting measures to preserve affordability and market stability [3] [5].