Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Do advanced practice nurses (NP, CNS, CRNA, CNM) require graduate-level professional degrees?
Executive summary
Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs)—the four roles NP, CNS, CNM and CRNA—are defined and credentialed by graduate-level programs; most APRN roles historically require a master’s (MSN) or higher, and the CRNA role is shifting to a doctoral (DNP) entry standard, with accreditation bodies/phasing guidance pushing all new CRNAs to doctoral-level programs by 2025 [1] [2] [3]. State boards and university admissions materials routinely state that APRN licensure/certification candidates must hold a graduate nursing degree (MSN or DNP) for NP, CNS, CNM and CRNA programs [4] [5] [6].
1. APRN is an umbrella term — graduate degree is the norm
All four APRN categories—nurse practitioners (NPs), clinical nurse specialists (CNSs), certified nurse‑midwives (CNMs) and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs)—are described in educational and professional materials as requiring graduate‑level education that certifies them to practice advanced, specialized care; common degrees cited are the Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) or the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) [1] [6]. State board licensing language likewise frames licensure for RNP/CNM/CNS/CRNA around completion of a graduate program in nursing [4].
2. CRNAs: the clearest, documented shift to a doctorate
Multiple sources document a deliberate move in nurse anesthesia education to a practice doctorate as the new entry requirement: accreditation and professional organizations have supported doctoral entry and by 2025 all new CRNA programs are expected to award the doctoral degree as the entry credential [7] [2] [3]. Reporting and program pages state that since 2022 many anesthesia programs have been on DNP tracks and that by 2025 graduating CRNAs will be required to hold a DNP or equivalent [8] [3].
3. NPs, CNMs and CNSs: graduate requirement, but doctorate not universally required
For nurse practitioners (NPs), certified nurse‑midwives (CNMs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs), sources show that graduate‑level preparation is required—traditionally the MSN—and many clinicians also pursue DNPs, but there is not a single, universal, immediate doctoral mandate across those roles like the CRNA change [6] [9]. Universities and professional outlets note that CNMs and CNSs “hold graduate‑level nursing degrees” and may pursue the DNP optionally; program admissions often accept MSN‑level credentials for APRN certification [9] [5].
4. Licensing versus program entry: what “require” can mean
Available documents distinguish between degree required to sit for certification/licensure and degree awarded by current educational programs. For licensure/certification, state boards and certification exams historically accepted graduates of accredited MSN programs [4]. For program entry and accreditation, professional bodies and schools are increasingly specifying DNPs especially for CRNAs, while many NP/CNM/CNS programs still admit MSN or DNP applicants depending on the school and state [5] [10].
5. Practical impact: existing practitioners, transitions and institutional differences
Reporting emphasizes that current, already‑licensed CRNAs with master’s degrees typically are not required to return for a doctorate to retain licensure, but new entrants after the accreditation change will need doctoral preparation; institutions and employers may set their own hiring expectations [7] [3]. Universities advertise BSN‑to‑DNP and post‑MSN‑to‑DNP pathways for NPs, CNSs and CRNAs, indicating that many programs expect or support doctoral progression though requirements vary by program [10] [11].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas
Advocates for the DNP conversion (notably anesthesia accreditation and profession leadership) argue the doctorate aligns nursing with other health professions and reflects rising clinical complexity [3]. Critics and observers—while not quoted directly in these sources—have historically worried about cost, access, and workforce pipeline effects; the available sources emphasize the accreditation decision and institutional implementation rather than extensive debate [3] [2]. University pages and nursing career sites also have an implicit recruitment agenda: promoting DNP programs and framing doctoral credentials as the “next step” in professional competitiveness [11] [12].
7. What the sources do not say
Available sources do not comprehensively state a universal, across‑the‑board doctoral requirement for NPs, CNMs, or CNSs at the national licensure level—rather, they document graduate‑level expectations (MSN or DNP) and a clear, documented doctorate transition for CRNAs by 2025 [6] [2] [3]. Sources also do not provide a single federal rule or statute mandating doctoral credentials for all APRNs; licensing language appears handled at the state and accreditation level [4] [3].
Bottom line: APRN roles require graduate education; the CRNA role has a documented shift to doctoral‑level entry by 2025, while NP, CNM and CNS candidates typically need graduate (MSN or DNP) preparation but are not uniformly required by the cited sources to hold a doctorate for initial certification [2] [6] [3].