How did the American Rescue Plan and subsequent laws change premium tax credits compared with pre-2021 policy?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) sharply increased and broadened Advance Premium Tax Credits (APTCs), making many more people eligible and lowering required household contributions so that, for example, people at or below 150% of the federal poverty level can enroll in a Silver plan with a $0 premium; CMS estimated average premium reductions of about $50 per person per month after the ARPA changes [1] [2]. Congress extended those “enhanced” credits through 2025 in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), but current law sets the enhanced rules to expire after 2025, returning subsidy rules to pre‑2021 levels unless Congress acts [2] [3] [4].
1. What changed in plain terms: bigger credits and more people qualified
Before ARPA, premium tax credits followed the original ACA schedule that generally capped eligibility at 100–400% of the federal poverty level (FPL) and required higher household contributions at many income levels. ARPA temporarily lowered the maximum required contribution at every eligible income level and eliminated the “subsidy cliff” by allowing people with incomes above 400% FPL to qualify for credits if premiums exceeded 8.5% of income; the net effect was larger subsidies for most existing recipients and newly eligible subsidies for some higher‑income households [5] [6] [7].
2. Immediate consumer effects: lower premiums, zero‑premium options for low‑income enrollees
CMS reported that ARPA’s changes would reduce premiums on average by roughly $50 per person per month and make plans available for very low monthly costs for many enrollees — CMS said four out of five enrollees could find a plan for $10 or less per month after credits, and over half could find a Silver plan for $10 or less [1]. State materials and analysts confirm that people at or below 150% FPL could qualify for a Silver plan with no monthly premium in many cases [2] [4].
3. The legislative lifespan: temporary enhancements extended through 2025
ARPA’s enhancements were initially for 2021–2022; the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022 extended the enhanced PTCs through the end of 2025. Multiple policy trackers and state exchanges note that, under current law, these enhanced subsidies expire on December 31, 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them [2] [5] [4].
4. What would revert if enhancements expire in 2026
Analysts and congressional research note that expiration would generally increase premium contributions and shrink subsidy amounts back toward pre‑ARPA levels. The Congressional Research Service and KFF project that the end of enhanced PTCs would raise premiums paid by households and could be a major driver of the higher exchange premiums observed for 2026 compared with 2025 — one estimate cited a large average increase [3] [7]. KFF’s tools and BlueCross state guidance warn consumers that tax credits would “go back” to pre‑2021 amounts absent renewal [8] [9].
5. Scale and enrollment effects: more enrollees received subsidies
The enhanced credits materially increased the number of subsidized enrollees and enrollment overall. One industry write‑up notes that by 2025, enrollment rose substantially and the vast majority of enrollees received enhanced APTCs [10]. Health Affairs and others point to consumer confusion and the political fight over continuation as central concerns for marketplace behavior ahead of 2026 open enrollment deadlines [6].
6. Competing perspectives and political stakes
Supporters argue ARPA/IRA enhancements made coverage affordable and closed an arbitrary cliff at 400% FPL, increasing access for middle‑income families and lowering premiums for lower‑income households [6] [1]. Critics and some fiscal conservatives have different priorities, and legislative debate over extensions or alternatives (including proposals tied to HSAs or different funding offsets) is active; reporting indicates partisan disagreement about tradeoffs and long‑term fiscal implications [10] [6].
7. What reporting doesn’t say or leaves unclear
Available sources do not mention long‑term behavioral effects—like whether permanently higher subsidies would change insurer participation or care utilization in a predictable way beyond the short‑term premium impacts cited (not found in current reporting). Likewise, fine‑grained distributional numbers for every income decile across every state are not provided in the selected materials (available sources do not mention those detailed breakdowns) [7] [3].
8. Practical takeaway for consumers and policymakers
For consumers: the enhanced credits have materially reduced net premiums through 2025; if Congress does not act, many households will face higher payments in 2026 [1] [8]. For policymakers: choices are straightforward — extend enhancements to preserve affordability gains or allow reversion and accept higher consumer premium burdens and political blowback during the 2026 coverage year [3] [6].
Limitations: this account relies solely on the supplied sources and reflects their focus on ARPA/IRA mechanics, CMS estimates, and policy analysis; it does not incorporate reporting outside the provided set [1] [2].