What are the total annual costs of ACA subsidies to the US government?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The federal government’s annual gross cost for Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace premium tax credits rose from $18 billion in 2014 to about $92 billion in 2023 and is estimated at roughly $138 billion in 2025 under the expanded COVID-era rules (American Rescue Plan and Inflation Reduction Act) [1]. Analysts project that letting the enhanced credits expire will reduce near‑term federal outlays but leave millions facing much higher premiums; extending credits would add hundreds of billions to the deficit over the next decade depending on the policy [1] [2].
1. What the headline numbers mean: gross federal spending vs. net effects
When reporters cite the ACA “cost,” they usually mean gross federal spending on premium tax credits — money paid to insurers on behalf of enrollees throughout the year — which grew from $18 billion in 2014 to an estimated $138 billion in 2025 because of rising enrollment and temporary subsidy enhancements [1]. That figure is a gross cash outlay and does not capture offsetting revenue effects, changes in other programs, or downstream budget impacts modeled over a decade; independent analysts differ on how to translate annual spending into long‑term budget scores [1] [2].
2. Why costs jumped so fast: policy changes and enrollment
The American Rescue Plan and later the Inflation Reduction Act temporarily expanded premium tax credits from 2021 through 2025, making subsidies more generous (including full coverage of benchmark premiums for some low‑income enrollees), while marketplace enrollment rose from roughly 5.5 million in 2014 to an estimated 23 million in 2025 — both effects pushed gross spending sharply upward to the $138 billion estimate for 2025 [1].
3. What happens if the enhanced credits expire on schedule
Current law lets the enhanced credits end after 2025. Analysts and news organizations report that letting them lapse would lower federal subsidy outlays relative to 2025 levels but cause average premiums for marketplace consumers to spike — KFF estimates a 114% average increase in out‑of‑pocket premium payment (about $1,016 more annually per household in one KFF calculation), and other reporting shows average premiums for subsidy recipients could jump from $888 in 2025 to $1,904 in 2026 if credits lapse [3] [4].
4. The political tradeoffs and competing bills
In December 2025 Congress debated competing proposals: Democrats pushed a multi‑year extension of the enhanced credits, while some Republicans offered alternative measures (including smaller, targeted payments or redirection into HSAs). Senate votes in December 2025 failed to reach the 60‑vote threshold for either approach, leaving expiration likely and demonstrating the partisan split over costs, coverage and program integrity [5] [6] [7].
5. Budget‑score estimates: short term vs. decade‑long debt impact
Policy shops differ on fiscal math. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) notes the annual gross cost rose to $138 billion in 2025 [1]. CRFB also estimated a specific Senate bill would add $350 billion to the national debt over the next decade (or $635 billion if subsidies were extended permanently), illustrating how one legislative option’s cumulative cost can dwarf a single‑year figure [2]. That demonstrates the difference between citing a single‑year gross cost and projecting multi‑year budgetary effects [1] [2].
6. Who bears the economic burden if subsidies end
Reporting from KFF, AP and other outlets highlights that millions of marketplace enrollees — particularly lower‑ and middle‑income households and people in rural areas or older age bands — would face steep premium and deductible increases if the enhanced credits end, with some estimates of average premium hikes ranging from roughly 75% to 114% depending on methodology [3] [8] [4]. Those consumer impacts are central to lawmakers’ disagreement over whether federal spending is justified.
7. Limits of available reporting and open questions
Available sources report gross annual spending estimates and legislative cost projections but do not provide a single, universally accepted “total annual cost” that captures net budget offsets, state fiscal interactions, or longer‑term macroeconomic effects; different analyses use different baselines and windows [1] [2]. Sources cited here do not supply a comprehensive net‑of‑offsets, long‑run federal budget figure that would settle debates about affordability [1] [2].
Bottom line: the commonly cited number for 2025 — about $138 billion in gross federal ACA marketplace subsidies — is grounded in contemporaneous budget estimates and driven by generous temporary policy changes plus high enrollment [1]. Whether that spending continues, and how policymakers weigh it against consumer affordability and long‑term debt impacts, remains the core political and fiscal dispute reflected in recent votes and analyses [5] [2].