Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Does the Apple Watch cause cancer?

Checked on January 29, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The question of whether Apple Watch causes cancer is complex and involves two distinct concerns:

EMF Radiation:

  • The Apple Watch emits radiation through Bluetooth, WiFi, and cellular connections [1]
  • The World Health Organization has classified RF exposure as a Group 2B possible carcinogen in 2011 [1]
  • Research shows EMF radiation can potentially cause DNA mutations [2]

PFAS "Forever Chemicals":

  • Multiple studies found PFAS in 15 out of 22 tested smartwatch bands at "concerning" levels [3]
  • Specifically affects Apple Watch Sport Band, Ocean Band, and Nike Sport Band [4]
  • Apple acknowledges PFAS presence but maintains products are safe through independent testing [5]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question oversimplifies a nuanced issue:

  • Risk Mitigation: Users can reduce potential EMF exposure by using airplane mode and minimizing direct contact [2]
  • Regulatory Compliance: Apple claims its safety standards exceed regulatory requirements [4]
  • Future Changes: Apple is actively working to phase out PFAS materials while seeking alternatives that maintain performance [5]
  • Exposure Mechanism: PFAS chemicals can potentially be absorbed through skin contact [6]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

Several competing interests are at play:

  • Legal Perspective: A class action lawsuit alleges Apple misled consumers about watch band safety [6], creating potential bias in public discourse
  • Corporate Interest: Apple has financial motivation to defend its products, maintaining they are safe while acknowledging the need for chemical phase-out [5]
  • Scientific Uncertainty: While studies show correlations between EMF radiation and health risks [1], definitively linking the device to cancer remains premature [2]
  • Marketing Irony: The lawsuit highlights the contradiction of a health-tracking device potentially exposing users to harmful chemicals [7]
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?