How do ARP subsidies compare to pre-2021 ACA subsidy levels?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The American Rescue Plan (ARP) and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) increased and temporarily expanded ACA premium tax credits from 2021 through 2025: they lowered required enrollee contributions (for many making premiums effectively free at low incomes), removed the 400% FPL eligibility cap through 2025, and produced substantially larger subsidies and lower after-subsidy premiums versus pre‑2021 rules (e.g., average household savings over $800/year and much higher share of enrollees finding very low-cost plans) [1] [2] [3].
1. How ARP/IRA changed subsidy size: bigger checks, lower required shares
Before ARP, the ACA required people to pay a specified percentage of income toward the benchmark (second‑lowest‑cost Silver) plan; ARP/IRA reduced those “applicable percentages,” so across income bands eligible enrollees pay a smaller share of income and receive larger premium tax credits [1] [4]. For example, people between 100% and 150% of FPL can effectively have the benchmark premium fully covered under the ARP/IRA enhancements — a departure from the pre‑2021 schedule where they paid a non‑zero share [3] [5].
2. Expansion of eligibility — temporary removal of the 400% cliff
A major practical difference from pre‑2021 policy is the temporary lifting of the 400% FPL cutoff: ARP extended eligibility above 400% FPL when premiums would otherwise exceed 8.5% of income, meaning some higher‑income households who had no subsidy before became eligible through 2025 [1] [6]. The 400% “subsidy cliff” that existed from 2014–2020 returned as a policy concept if enhancements expire after 2025 [7] [8].
3. Quantifying the impact — reported savings and enrollment effects
Reporting tied the enhanced credits to large reductions in premiums and enrollment growth: studies cited show large average savings (for example, a commonly cited figure is average household savings over $800/year) and dramatic increases in enrollment and low after‑subsidy plan prices — e.g., “80% of federal marketplace enrollees could find a plan for $120 or less per year” early in the ARP period and large decreases in required contributions for many households [2] [9] [3]. CMS and analysts also documented significant federal spending increases tied to the enhanced structure between 2014 and 2025 [3].
4. What “reverting to pre‑2021 rules” would mean in practice
If enhanced PTCs are not extended past 2025, the rules will revert to the statutory ACA parameters: the 400% FPL cap returns, applicable percentages increase (meaning enrollees pay a larger share of income toward the benchmark plan), and subsidies shrink for most current recipients compared with ARP/IRA levels [1] [10] [4]. Analysts and advocacy materials warn that many enrollees would face higher premiums or lose eligibility entirely, producing what’s commonly described as the return of the “subsidy cliff” in 2026 [7] [8].
5. Where sources agree and where they differ
All provided sources agree on the core facts: ARP/IRA temporarily expanded eligibility and increased subsidy amounts for 2021–2025, producing larger subsidies and enrollment effects relative to the pre‑2021 ACA baseline [1] [3] [6]. Differences across sources are emphases: advocacy and congressional materials highlight consumer savings and access gains [2]; policy analysts and CMS materials stress cost and fiscal impacts and the technical details of how required enrollee percentages would change if enhancements expire [4] [3].
6. Limits of current reporting and unanswered specifics
Available sources document the general scale and mechanics of the enhancements and describe scenario examples, but they do not provide a single uniform table comparing every exact pre‑2021 percentage versus ARP percentages for all FPL bands in one place in these snippets — readers seeking a cell‑by‑cell percentage comparison should consult the primary CMS/IRS tables or the appendix materials referenced in the Congressional Research Service note [1] [4]. Also, while sources quantify average savings and enrollment change, local variations (state, age, plan mix) mean individual impacts will differ [2] [9].
7. Bottom line for consumers and policymakers
Compared with pre‑2021 ACA subsidy levels, ARP/IRA subsidies from 2021–2025 are larger, apply to more households (including some above 400% FPL), and reduce enrollee premium contributions across the board; letting the enhancements expire would shrink subsidies and reinstate the 400% FPL limit beginning in 2026, raising costs for many marketplace enrollees [1] [7] [4]. Policymakers must weigh consumer affordability gains against federal costs when deciding whether to extend, modify, or end the temporary enhancements [3] [9].