Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What is the average flaccid penis girth in inches and cm?

Checked on November 12, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

Multiple large measurements and meta-analyses place the average flaccid penis girth at roughly 9.3 cm (about 3.66–3.67 inches), with studies reporting typical ranges from about 9 to 10 cm (3.5–3.9 in). Regional samples and measurement methods cause modest variation, but the convergent finding across systematic reviews and large cohorts supports this central estimate [1] [2] [3].

1. Big studies and the headline number that stuck

Large-scale meta-analyses and multi‑cohort studies converge on a similar central estimate for flaccid girth: approximately 9.1–9.6 cm, commonly reported as about 9.3 cm (3.66–3.67 in). A systematic meta-analysis covering 30,117 men calculated a mean flaccid circumference close to 9.10 cm (3.58 in), while other widely cited compilations that sampled over 15,000 men reported an average of about 9.31 cm (3.66–3.67 in) [1] [2] [4]. These aggregated numbers form the basis for the commonly quoted average, reflecting pooled measurements performed under clinical or study conditions rather than casual self-report alone [1] [2].

2. Geographic and cohort differences that change the picture

Measured averages vary by population sample and locale: some regional cohorts report slightly larger or smaller means. For example, an Italian cohort of 4,685 young men found a mean flaccid girth of about 9.59 cm (3.78 in), while the meta-analysis noted the largest mean flaccid circumference among Americans at roughly 10.00 cm (3.94 in) [5] [1]. A UK clinical overview and other practice summaries place the typical range at 9–10 cm (3.5–3.9 in). These differences are consistent with sampling, age distribution, and recruitment methods rather than evidence of dramatic global disparities [5] [6].

3. Why methodology changes reported averages

Measurement technique drives meaningful variation: studies using clinician-measured circumferences under standardized conditions tend to produce more reliable—and slightly different—means than self-reported data. The largest meta-analysis and BJU International compilation drew on studies that used clinical measurements and standardized protocols, resulting in tighter estimates [1] [4]. Conversely, sources that summarize web or clinic‑based reports or preference surveys may mix self-report and measured values, inflating variance. Sample size also matters: the precision of the mean improves with thousands of measured participants, which is why pooled studies of 4,600 to over 30,000 men are given greater weight [5] [1].

4. Flaccid versus erect: context you must keep in mind

Girth or circumference measures refer to the penis’s cross‑sectional perimeter; flaccid girth is not directly comparable to erect circumference and tends to be smaller. Meta-analyses typically report flaccid girth around 9.1–9.6 cm and erect circumference nearer 11.7–11.9 cm (about 4.6–4.7 in) in pooled datasets, underscoring that posture and state (flaccid vs erect) must be specified when quoting numbers [3] [7]. Many public or lay listings that conflate length and girth or fail to identify measurement state produce confusion, which clinical studies aim to eliminate with standardized descriptions [3] [7].

5. Preferences and perceptions: what people report wanting versus measured reality

Separate from anatomical measurement, research on partner preferences records different numbers: a 2015 study summarized in reviews found female partner preferences for girth near 12.2–12.7 cm (4.8–5.0 in) for long‑term and one‑time partners, figures notably larger than measured population averages [8]. This contrast highlights the difference between measured biological averages and subjective ideals expressed in preference studies; the former reflects population anatomy, while the latter captures aesthetic or sexual preference, which can diverge substantially from real-world means [8].

6. Bottom line — best single number to use and the credible range

Considering large meta-analyses and multiple sizable cohort studies, the best single estimate for average flaccid penis girth is about 9.3 cm (3.66–3.67 inches), with a credible typical range roughly 9–10 cm (3.5–3.9 in) across studies and regions. Larger and clinician‑measured studies underpin this central estimate; regional cohorts and preference surveys deviate for clear methodological or perceptual reasons. For practical purposes—clinical counseling, education, or research reporting—quote ~9.3 cm (3.66 in) for flaccid girth while specifying measurement method and state to avoid misinterpretation [1] [2] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the average erect penis girth in inches and cm?
How is penis girth accurately measured in medical studies?
What factors influence variations in flaccid penis size?
Are there differences in average penis girth by ethnicity or region?
What are common myths about penis size and girth?