Average width of man's penis
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Large systematic reviews and multiple medical outlets place the average erect penis length at roughly 5.1–5.5 inches (≈13.0–13.6 cm) and average erect circumference (girth) near 11.66 cm (4.59 in) — figures derived from measured, not self‑reported, studies [1] [2] [3]. Different datasets, measurement methods, and volunteer bias produce slightly different averages and ranges, and reporting often conflates flaccid, stretched and erect measures [2] [3].
1. The headline numbers reporters cite — and why they vary
Most recent meta‑analyses and reviews converge on an erect length of about 5.1–5.5 inches (12.95–13.97 cm) and an erect circumference near 11.66 cm (4.59 in) based on professional measurements [3] [2]. WorldPopulationReview and other aggregators echo that range and present a commonly used mid‑point of ~13.12 cm (5.17 in) for erect length [4] [5]. Variations come from differences in: whether measurements were self‑reported or taken by clinicians (self‑reports tend to be larger), whether flaccid, stretched or erect states were recorded, and sample selection and geography [2] [6].
2. Measurement methods change the result — a methodological caution
Studies measured from the pubic bone to the glans tip with pubic fat compressed to standardize length — the technique used by Veale and others to limit overestimation [6]. Reviews that combine stretched, erect and flaccid measures report different means: for instance, pooled studies of erect measurements gave a combined mean near 5.36 in, while stretched‑penis studies average around 5.11 in, illustrating how the chosen metric shifts the headline number [3]. Many earlier surveys relied on self‑measurement and therefore overestimate size compared to clinician‑measured datasets [6] [2].
3. Girth (width) is often as important in the literature as length
Several studies and reviews emphasize circumference as a distinct variable and note that some partners prioritize width over length for sexual satisfaction [7] [2]. A 2015 systematic review that used clinician measurements reported an average erect circumference of 11.66 cm (4.59 in), reinforcing that “size” is two‑dimensional and often misrepresented by length alone [2].
4. Geography and sampling: real differences, or artefacts of small samples?
Country‑by‑country rankings (e.g., WorldPopulationReview, datapandas) report regional differences and list national averages ranging from under 10 cm to over 17 cm in some datasets, but these figures reflect heterogeneous study quality, small sample sizes in some countries, and differing methodologies [4] [5]. Systematic reviews that pool rigorously measured studies show much less dramatic global variation, suggesting some national extremes may be artefacts of sampling and reporting rather than robust biological differences [1] [4].
5. Perception versus reality: anxiety and cultural drivers
Large surveys show a disconnect: many men believe they are smaller than average while most partners report satisfaction with their partner’s size; media, pornography and cultural myths fuel unrealistic expectations [1] [8]. The clinical literature warns that men often seek risky procedures for perceived smallness despite being within typical ranges and recommends counseling and factual education [3] [8].
6. What the best evidence does not say
Available sources do not claim a single universal “correct” average that covers all men in all measurement conditions; instead, they present ranges tied to measurement method [2] [3]. Available sources do not establish a meaningful correlation between penis size and fertility, shoe size, or most other body measurements — reviews find correlations to be negligible or absent [4] [6].
7. Practical takeaway for readers
If you want a single, defensible headline: clinician‑measured studies place average erect length at about 5.1–5.5 inches (≈13 cm) and erect girth near 11.66 cm (4.59 in) — but remember measurement method, bias and sampling explain most divergence between studies [3] [2]. For personal concerns, clinical guidance and counseling are the evidence‑backed options; sensational rankings and self‑reported figures should be treated skeptically [8] [1].