Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is Dr. Ben Carson's 'blue honey' claim and how did it originate?
Executive summary
Dr. Ben Carson has repeatedly been the target of fabricated medical endorsements and deepfaked videos claiming he discovered or promoted miracle treatments — including gummies, nasal sprays, CBD products and other “cures” — but available reporting shows these health-claim advertisements are fake and that Carson and his representatives have disavowed them [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The specific phrase “blue honey” does not appear in the provided sources; available sources do not mention a “blue honey” claim tied to Dr. Ben Carson (not found in current reporting).
1. What the reporting actually documents: a pattern of fake medical endorsements
Multiple fact-checkers and news outlets have documented a recurring pattern: social media posts and ads have used doctored screenshots, fabricated news articles and manipulated video or audio to link Dr. Ben Carson to unproven or fake health products, and Carson’s spokespeople have repeatedly said he never endorsed those products (PolitiFact, AFP, USA TODAY, Reuters, AFP) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Examples include claims about CBD gummies for high blood pressure, a nasal spray marketed as reversing Alzheimer’s, and “blood vessel–cleaning” gummies that he never promoted [1] [2] [3] [6].
2. How these fabrications spread and the tactics used
The misleading posts often rely on fabricated headlines or mock-ups of legitimate outlets (for instance, an edited USA TODAY-like page), doctored images and videos, and the use of celebrity names to lend false credibility; fact-checkers note that the headlines are fabricated and that altered screenshots were used to fool readers [1] [3] [4]. Deepfake tools and simple video/audio splicing have been identified as methods used in prior cases involving Carson, and academic media-forensics labs have analyzed such fakes [6] [7].
3. Carson’s and his spokespeople’s responses
In each documented instance, Carson’s representatives have stated he never endorsed, developed or even heard of the products being advertised. For example, a spokesperson called an AlzClipp nasal spray promotion “a scam and completely fake,” and Reuters and USA TODAY reported Carson’s team denied the claims [3] [5]. AFP also quoted a spokesman saying Carson had no role in the alleged Alzheimer’s product and that the ads were false [2].
4. Independent fact-checks and consensus among outlets
Major fact-checking organizations — PolitiFact, Reuters, AFP and USA TODAY — all reached the same conclusion in separate cases: the claims tying Carson to miracle cures are false or unsupported. PolitiFact found a fabricated CBD endorsement; Reuters said Carson did not cure dementia with any diet; AFP and USA TODAY debunked links tying him to an Alzheimer’s inhaler [1] [5] [2] [3]. That convergence strengthens the finding that these are recurring misinformation campaigns rather than isolated errors [1] [2] [3] [5].
5. What the sources do not say — the “blue honey” gap
None of the provided articles or fact-checks mention “blue honey” in connection with Dr. Ben Carson. Available sources do not mention a “blue honey” claim tied to him; therefore we cannot confirm its existence, origin, or content from the materials provided (not found in current reporting).
6. Possible reasons a new phrase might appear and how to verify it
Given the established pattern — fake headlines, doctored screenshots and manipulated video/audio — if a new term such as “blue honey” is circulating attached to Carson, it may be part of the same misinformation playbook: invented product name, fabricated endorsement, or altered media. To verify, look for primary evidence identified by fact-checkers: official statements from Carson or his organization, reporting from recognized outlets, entries in FDA or other regulatory databases for the product, and forensic analysis of images or video for signs of manipulation [1] [3] [6].
7. Why this matters — agendas, persuasion and commercial scams
Reporting shows these fake endorsements frequently appear in ads or pages that are commercial in purpose (selling supplements or devices) or politically useful because Carson is a recognizable conservative figure; fact-checkers highlight both the commercial scam element and the potential to exploit his public profile for credibility [1] [2] [4]. That dual motive — profit plus persuasive power — is an implicit agenda behind recurring false health claims tied to public figures.
If you can share a screenshot, link, or exact wording of the “blue honey” post you’ve seen, I will analyze it against the documented patterns (fabricated headlines, doctored media, spokesperson denials) and check for matches in the fact-check sources above [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].