Is there a dementia medicine made with honey and another substance made by Dr. Ben Carson Carson?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no credible evidence that Dr. Ben Carson developed a dementia medicine made with honey and another substance, nor that he endorsed any such product; multiple fact‑checks say claims linking Carson to miracle dementia cures are fabricated [1] [2]. Reporting from AFP, Reuters, Lead Stories and others shows social posts and ads use fake endorsements, doctored audio and invented headlines to sell unproven remedies [1] [3] [2] [4].
1. Viral claims and the product pitch — how the story spreads
Social posts and sponsored pages have repeatedly presented fabricated stories that a revered surgeon or celebrity discovered simple, natural cures for dementia; one recent example named a nasal spray “AlzClipp,” used fake USA Today‑style pages, and claimed FDA approval that does not appear in the regulator’s database [1]. AFP documents that these marketing pages include altered audio and bogus certificates to create the appearance of legitimacy and to push products on retail sites such as Amazon and Walmart [1].
2. What Dr. Ben Carson’s camp and fact‑checkers say
Carson’s representatives have publicly denied these endorsements and described many of the viral items as “completely fake”; Reuters reports Brad Bishop, a spokesperson for Carson’s organization, saying Carson has not endorsed or even heard of such cures [2]. Lead Stories and AFP independently found no credible reports that Carson discovered dietary or other simple cures for dementia, and label the posts hoaxes [4] [3].
3. The medical reality about dementia cures
Major medical authorities and multiple fact‑check outlets note there is currently no cure for Alzheimer’s disease or most causes of dementia; treatments can manage symptoms or modestly slow progression but do not reverse the disease as some ads claim [1] [2] [4]. AFP quotes experts saying claims that products can “prevent Alzheimer’s” or “reverse dementia” are unsupported by evidence [1].
4. Common tactics used in these scams
The promotors mix authoritative names, doctored audio and fake news layouts to exploit trust. AFP documents that advertisers paste Carson or celebrities into staged “news” articles and attach falsified FDA certificates; Lead Stories shows similar patterns where sensational timelines (“works in 7 days”) and miracle narratives are repeated despite lacking any clinical backing [1] [4].
5. Why honey + X narratives are plausible but unsupported
People naturally gravitate toward simple, natural remedies (like honey plus another ingredient) for complex chronic illnesses. However, the available reporting does not identify any legitimate honey‑based dementia medicine linked to Carson; Reuters and AFP explicitly refute claims that Carson cured dementia with diet or promoted specific natural remedies [2] [1]. Available sources do not mention a honey‑and‑other‑substance dementia medicine created by Dr. Ben Carson.
6. Alternative viewpoints and remaining uncertainties
Some vendors and social posts continue to suggest supplements or CBD products can aid cognitive health, and a few platforms discuss limited or preliminary research into cannabinoids or diet and cognition. But fact‑checkers caution evidence is limited and these claims are not endorsements by Carson; one site notes CBD’s evidence is weak and that Carson has not endorsed such products [5] [6]. The reporting shows both the existence of marketing claims and the scientific community’s skepticism [1] [2] [4] [5].
7. Practical guidance for readers who encounter these claims
Treat social‑media “testimonials” and ad pages that cite famous people with extreme skepticism; check FDA approval databases and reputable health institutions before believing treatment claims [1]. Fact‑check outlets recommend contacting a named person’s spokesperson for confirmation — Carson’s team has repeatedly denied involvement in such products [2].
Limitations: these conclusions rely on the set of fact‑checks and reporting provided; if there are privately published studies or new regulatory approvals not covered in these sources, those are not reflected here. Available reporting consistently finds the honey/other‑substance plus Carson narrative is unsupported and frequently fabricated [1] [3] [2] [4].