How are benchmark plan premiums calculated and used to set household contribution caps by FPL percentage?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Benchmark premiums are the second‑lowest cost Silver plan (SLCSP) in a local Marketplace and they set the dollar amount from which premium tax credits are calculated; the tax credit equals the benchmark premium minus the household’s required contribution cap, which is a percentage of income that (2021–2025) was capped at no more than 8.5% for higher incomes under ARPA/IRA [1] [2] [3]. The marketplace calculates required household contributions using a sliding “applicable percentage” tied to federal poverty level (FPL) bands (0% up to 150% FPL, rising to 8.5% at 400%+ under the enhanced rules), then subtracts that cap from the benchmark premium to produce the PTC applied to any plan the enrollee buys [4] [3] [5].
1. What the “benchmark” actually is — and why it matters
The term “benchmark plan” in the ACA context normally means the second‑lowest‑cost Silver plan (SLCSP) available to a household in its Marketplace area; that dollar price is the reference point the eligibility system uses to compute Advance Premium Tax Credits (APTCs) and to define the household contribution cap [1] [6]. CMS and marketplace tools repeatedly treat the SLCSP as the standard premium amount against which household affordability is measured [6].
2. How the household contribution cap is set — the sliding percentage method
For subsidy‑eligible households the marketplace assigns an “applicable percentage” of household income that represents the maximum the household must contribute toward the benchmark plan. That percentage follows a sliding scale by income as a share of FPL: very low incomes may have a 0% cap (up through 150% FPL in 2025 in practice), mid‑range incomes pay a few percent, and by 400%+ FPL the applicable percentage historically reached 8.5% — though the ARPA/IRA enhancements changed eligibility and effective caps through 2025 [4] [3] [2]. The APTC equals benchmark premium minus that annual cap [5].
3. The arithmetic: from benchmark premium to tax credit
The calculation is straightforward in principle and consistently explained by policy guides: determine the local SLCSP annual premium, compute the household’s annual required contribution (income × applicable percentage), then the premium tax credit = benchmark premium − annual cap (floored at zero). If the benchmark premium is below the annual cap, the credit is zero; if the cap is below the benchmark, the difference is paid as the credit and can be applied to any Marketplace plan the enrollee selects [5] [3] [7].
4. Why plan selection and local markets change the math
Benchmark premiums vary by county and by insurer participation; CMS reports and state‑level analyses weight county plan selections to produce metrics, and year‑to‑year changes in which Silver plan is second cheapest can shift subsidies for many enrollees [6] [8]. Enhanced credits under ARPA/IRA changed who qualifies and reduced out‑of‑pocket after‑subsidy premiums for many ages and family sizes, meaning the same applicable percentage can produce very different dollar credits depending on the local benchmark [8] [9].
5. Interaction with plan choice: paying more or less than the benchmark
The calculated premium tax credit amount is anchored to the benchmark premium but is portable: enrollees may spend it on any Marketplace plan. If they choose a plan more expensive than the benchmark, they pay the difference out of pocket; if they choose a cheaper plan, they may pay less than their assigned cap or even owe nothing in premium after APTC [3] [4].
6. Policy changes and timing matter — the 2021–2025 enhancements and beyond
From 2021 through 2025, Congress temporarily expanded and enhanced PTCs (ARPA, extended by IRA), removing the hard 400% FPL eligibility cliff and ensuring no one pays more than roughly 8.5% of income for the benchmark plan in those years; if those enhancements expire, the applicable percentages and eligibility would revert toward pre‑2021 rules, changing household caps and credit amounts materially [2] [9] [5]. Several analyses warn that expiration would raise net premiums for many households, especially those above 400% FPL [9].
7. Limitations, disagreements and things not covered in these sources
Available sources document the formula mechanics and show how ARPA/IRA affected caps and eligibility, but they do not provide a single authoritative 2026 schedule of applicable percentages (some outlets model un‑enhanced caps for 2026) nor do these documents present individualized calculator outputs for every county and household—those require marketplace tools or state data [5] [6]. Sources differ in emphasis: CMS reports focus on aggregate premium metrics and estimated total yearly costs (including out‑of‑pocket estimates) while advocacy and explainer sites focus on consumer examples and how the sliding scale applies in practice [8] [3] [6].
8. What a consumer should do next
Use your local Marketplace or a trusted state resource to see the actual SLCSP in your county and run the enrolment calculator—APTC amounts are computed automatically during application, but the numbers depend on local benchmark premiums and the precise applicable percentage tied to your projected MAGI [6] [3]. If you want policy context or to estimate post‑2025 changes, consult analyses that model the effect of ARPA/IRA expiration on benchmark premiums and household caps [9] [5].
Sources referenced: CMS Qualified Health Plan premiums and methodology reports [8] [6], explainer and FAQ materials on premium tax credits [10] [3], KFF and HealthInsurance.org explainers on applicable percentages and benchmark role [4] [1] [2], and policy analyses on enhanced PTC effects [9] [5].