Has Bill Gates publicly endorsed any diabetes supplements or over‑the‑counter products?

Checked on January 6, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Bill Gates has not publicly endorsed diabetes supplements or over‑the‑counter diabetes cures in the reporting provided; recent viral ads that show Gates promoting products such as “Gluco Delete Drops” have been exposed as scams using fabricated or deepfaked footage and are explicitly denied by multiple debunking reports [1] [2]. Gates has, however, publicly discussed expanding access to clinically approved diabetes‑related medicines and weight‑loss drugs through philanthropic channels, which is distinct from endorsing retail supplements or OTC “miracle” cures [3] [4].

1. Evidence against any public endorsement: debunks and direct denials

Investigations into flashy online promotions for “natural” diabetes cures repeatedly note that Bill Gates has never endorsed those products, with at least two separate fact‑checking or scam‑exposure pieces concluding Gates did not promote the supplements featured in the ads [1] [2]. These debunking reports single out the ads’ use of fabricated celebrity endorsements and note the absence of credible scientific backing or regulatory approval for the promoted supplements, underpinning the claim that Gates has not lent his name to such products [1] [2].

2. The Gluco Delete Drops case: a concrete example of deepfake misuse

A prominent recent example is the Gluco Delete Drops campaign, which investigators and scam‑analysis sites say uses deepfaked video and fabricated endorsements that include a faux Bill Gates saying the product can “reverse Type 2 diabetes”; the same reporting concludes that Gates has never endorsed that product and that the drops lack FDA approval and clinical proof as a diabetes treatment [1] [2]. Those articles describe typical scam mechanics—emotional storytelling, fake guarantees, subscription traps and fabricated clinical claims—rather than any legitimate association with Gates or his foundation [1] [2].

3. Gates’ real public position: expanding access to approved drugs, not selling supplements

Public comments and interviews attributed to Bill Gates and representatives of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation emphasize making clinically tested medicines affordable and more widely available—recent reporting shows Gates discussing how a foundation approach could help bring effective weight‑loss drugs (GLP‑1 receptor agonists originally developed for diabetes) to lower‑income countries, which is policy and philanthropy work rather than commercial endorsement of OTC supplements [3] [4]. Reuters and Newsweek coverage make clear that the conversation is about access, research and affordability for medically prescribed drugs, not about promoting consumer supplements [3] [4].

4. Historical entanglements with diabetes drug politics do not equal personal product endorsements

Past investigatory reporting has linked individuals affiliated with the Gates Foundation to wider industry controversies—such as a 2007 U.S. Senate probe that sought interviews with a Gates Foundation health official over alleged efforts to stifle criticism of the diabetes drug Avandia—but this is institutional or personnel scrutiny rather than evidence that Bill Gates personally markets or endorses OTC diabetes remedies [5]. The historical record cited is about pharmaceutical policy and professional conduct, not retail supplement promotion [5].

5. The proliferation of low‑quality “Gates endorsed” content and reporting limitations

A raft of blog and beauty‑blog style pages recycle speculative headlines and “health hack” lists invoking Gates’ name while acknowledging no official endorsement exists, illustrating how search results and viral content can blur the line between Gates’ public health commentary and bogus product claims [6] [7] [8] [9]. The reporting examined explicitly states that no major foundation or Gates himself has endorsed any single supplement as a diabetes cure, but available sources cannot by themselves catalog every possible fraudulent use of Gates’ likeness beyond the cited examples, so absolute assurance beyond these documented cases is beyond this file of reporting [1] [2] [7].

6. Conclusion — clear negative on endorsements, but active on access to approved medicines

The evidence in the provided reporting is straightforward: Bill Gates has not publicly endorsed diabetes supplements or over‑the‑counter “miracle” cures and has been the target of deepfake and scam campaigns that falsely attribute such endorsements to him [1] [2]. Separately, Gates and his foundation are publicly engaged in conversations and early‑stage work around improving access to clinically approved diabetes‑related and weight‑loss drugs, a policy and philanthropic arena that should not be conflated with commercial endorsement of unproven OTC supplements [3] [4] [10].

Want to dive deeper?
What documented instances of deepfake celebrity endorsements have been used to sell health supplements?
How has the Gates Foundation publicly discussed access to GLP‑1 weight‑loss drugs and diabetes treatments?
What official statements have Bill Gates or the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation issued denying use of his likeness in supplement ads?