What specific ingredients are in Burn Peak and their dosages?

1. What promoters and reviewers are claiming — a Bold Triple‑BHB Focus

Promotional language and several reviews converge on the claim that Burn Peak’s core active component is a Triple‑BHB salt blend (magnesium, calcium, sodium BHB) intended to raise circulating ketone levels and support metabolic shifts toward fat‑oxidation. Multiple analyses explicitly list those three BHB salts as primary ingredients and present the formulation as a ketone supplement rather than a classical thermogenic stimulant ^{[4] [1] [5]}. The emphasis on BHB salts is consistent across official pages and review summaries, and some materials position the product as free from added synthetic thermogenics and, in one analysis, free of caffeine, which matters for safety profiles and drug interactions ^{[1] [2]}. This repeated assertion frames Burn Peak principally as a ketone supplement rather than a stimulant‑based fat burner.

2. Secondary ingredients: a messy patchwork of botanicals and nutrients

Beyond the BHB salts the sources diverge widely: some lists include Maqui Berry, Amla Fruit, Rhodiola Rosea, Theobroma cacao, Haematococcus pluvialis, Schisandra, Bilberry, Brahmi, lutein/zeaxanthin, green tea extract, Garcinia cambogia, cayenne pepper, and caffeine in various combinations ^{[4] [5] [2]}. The variations indicate either multiple product formulations, inconsistent public labeling, or reviewers drawing from different product pages and user reports. Several analyses highlight that while these botanicals are commonly associated with antioxidant, adaptogenic, or modest metabolic effects, the presence and role of each ingredient in Burn Peak are not uniformly documented across supplied sources, making it impossible to reconcile a definitive secondary‑ingredient profile from the materials provided ^{[4] [2]}.

3. Dosage disclosure: the key missing fact that matters for efficacy and safety

None of the supplied analyses provide a full ingredient panel with per‑ingredient dosages; this is the most critical gap. One source reports a standard dosing recommendation of two capsules daily taken before meals, but it does not list milligram amounts for BHB salts or any botanical constituents ^[1]. The absence of quantified dosages prevents assessment of whether BHB content approaches levels used in published ketone salt studies, and it impedes evaluation of botanical safety margins or potential interactions. Without milligram breakdowns, clinicians and consumers cannot reliably judge expected physiological effects or risks, and claims of efficacy or tolerability remain untestable against clinical benchmarks ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Clinical claims versus verifiable evidence — study statements need scrutiny

Some materials assert a clinical study result — notably a reported 87% response rate in a 312‑participant study tied to Burn Peak — but the supplied analyses do not include a peer‑reviewed publication, trial protocol, or full study data that would allow independent verification ^{[6] [1]}. Promotional summaries referencing a high response rate are not accompanied by methodological details such as endpoints, blinding, control groups, or statistical adjustments. Marketing claims of clinical efficacy cannot be validated from the supplied sources; the discrepancy between bold study percentages and the lack of accessible study documents underscores the need for primary trial publications or regulatory filings to substantiate efficacy statements ^{[6] [1]}.

5. Safety signals and unresolved risk context

One analysis emphasizes general safety considerations for fat‑burner blends, noting that certain ingredients (bitter orange, yohimbe, ephedra) are known to pose risks at effective doses, though those particular agents are not documented in Burn Peak by the supplied sources ^[3]. The product’s variability in reported botanicals — including stimulants like caffeine in some lists but absent in others — creates uncertainty for consumers with cardiovascular conditions, hypertension, or who take interacting medications. The lack of standardized ingredient disclosure and dosage information is the primary safety concern, because risk assessment depends on exact amounts and combinations, not just ingredient names ^{[3] [2]}.

6. Bottom line: What’s verified, what’s uncertain, and the practical next steps

Verified from the supplied analyses: Burn Peak centers on magnesium, calcium, and sodium BHB and is marketed as a ketone salt formula; some pages recommend two capsules daily ^{[4] [1] [5]}. Unverified or inconsistent: the exhaustive secondary‑ingredient roster, per‑ingredient milligram dosages, and the claimed clinical trial details ^{[1] [6] [2]}. For consumers and clinicians seeking clarity, the next steps are straightforward: request a full Supplement Facts panel showing per‑ingredient amounts, ask for the primary clinical study’s protocol and full dataset, and consult a healthcare professional before use—especially for people with medical comorbidities or concurrent medications. These actions resolve the transparency gap that the supplied materials leave open. ^{[1] [3] [2]}