Are there lawsuits or class actions alleging false claims or adverse effects from Burn Peak?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows lawsuits and multiple legal actions over dangerous tabletop fire pits (not the Burn Peak supplement), with allegations of explosions, flame‑jetting and severe burns tied to alcohol‑fueled units and recalls by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; plaintiffs and law firms name makers and retailers including Colsen/FLÎKRfire and online sellers [1] [2]. Separately, consumer complaints, reviews and scam‑watch listings about the Burn Peak weight‑loss supplement appear across review sites, the BBB and scam trackers, but the sources here do not show class actions or product‑liability lawsuits against the Burn Peak supplement itself [3] [4] [5].
1. Lawsuits over tabletop fire pits: a growing body of product‑liability claims
Several lawsuits allege tabletop fire pits can “flash” or “whoosh” when refueled or splashed, causing severe second‑ and third‑degree burns; cases named in reporting include Hominski v. Gusar and claims against Colsen Fire Pits and others, with plaintiffs describing flame‑jetting and catastrophic burns covering large portions of the body [2]. Coverage notes that plaintiffs say designs were unreasonably dangerous and lacked adequate warnings, and law firms are actively pursuing individual and class‑style consumer claims tied to these incidents [2] [6].
2. Recalls, retailer warnings and regulatory action linked to the fire‑pit litigation
Reporting ties the lawsuits to regulatory moves: the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a recall of roughly 66,000 Five Below tabletop fire pits after reports of fuel splashing and flash fires, and Amazon began sending safety notices to purchasers of alcohol‑fueled models—actions that feed and are fed by the litigation environment [1]. Plaintiffs argue manufacturers marketed units to be refueled with common isopropyl alcohol, creating foreseeable explosion risks, an allegation repeated in multiple updates [1].
3. Where “Burn Peak” appears in reporting: complaints, reviews, and scam‑watch mentions
The name Burn Peak in the materials available here mostly refers to a dietary supplement and to consumer complaints about marketing and fulfillment: Trustpilot reviews cite refund problems and missing capsules [3], the BBB hosts a business profile showing non‑accreditation and consumer entries [5], and ScamTracker entries exist for “Burn Peak” [4]. Independent reviewers and aggregator sites debate legitimacy and side‑effects; some positively frame the product while others call the advertising deceptive [7] [8] [9].
4. No documented class action or product‑liability suits against the Burn Peak supplement in these sources
Within the set of documents provided, none of the items that discuss lawsuits are about the Burn Peak dietary supplement; the litigation referenced relates to tabletop fire pits and burn injuries [1] [2]. Sources discussing Burn Peak show user complaints, reviews, clinical‑style press releases, and scam warnings, but the available reporting here does not mention class actions or product‑liability lawsuits specifically targeting the Burn Peak supplement [3] [4] [10].
5. Contrasting narratives and potential agendas to note
Legal‑service and plaintiff‑oriented sites are amplifying the fire‑pit litigation and advising potential claimants, which can reflect firms’ incentive to recruit clients for contingency cases [6] [11]. Conversely, press releases and company statements about Burn Peak stress clinical results, safety, and channels to report adverse effects—a corporate public‑relations posture that aims to reassure customers while urging reporting to regulators [10] [12]. Independent reviewers and consumer‑help pages mix skeptical language about marketing tactics with anecdotal positive reports, indicating divergent agendas across review sites [8] [13].
6. What’s missing and what to watch next
Available sources do not mention any filed class‑action lawsuits against the Burn Peak supplement itself; they do, however, document active individual and putative class litigation over alcohol‑fueled tabletop fire pits and related recalls [2] [1]. If you are looking for class actions against Burn Peak specifically, monitor court dockets, the BBB complaint logs, and legal‑news services—current reporting here records consumer complaints and scam listings but not litigation filings [4] [3].
7. Practical takeaways for consumers and potential plaintiffs
If you or a family member suffered burns from a tabletop fire pit, plaintiff firms and resources cited in reporting recommend legal consultation because of recalls and several pending suits [6] [11]. For purchasers of Burn Peak the sources advise buying only through official channels to avoid counterfeit/reseller problems and to report adverse effects to healthcare providers and regulatory programs [3] [12].