What are the main ingredients in Burn Peak?

1. Conflicting Core Claim: Ketone Salts Versus Stimulant Thermogenics — Which Is the “Main” Ingredient?

Multiple recent analyses assert that BHB (beta‑hydroxybutyrate) ketone salts are central to Burn Peak’s formulation, frequently specified as magnesium, calcium and sodium BHB salts and framed as the metabolic engine of the product ^{[1] [4]}. Those sources date to late June and early November 2025 and describe BHB salts as designed to support ketosis, energy, and calorie burning. By contrast, other reviews present a stimulant‑centric profile dominated by green tea extracts, caffeine and L‑theanine, marketed for thermogenesis and appetite suppression ^[3]. The discrepancy indicates that either formulations vary by batch/region or secondary reporting is conflating similar weight‑loss products; the presence of BHB salts is the most consistently repeated specific compound across multiple recent analyses ^{[1] [4]}.

2. The Botanical and Antioxidant Crowd: Maqui, Rhodiola, Schisandra and More

Several sources expand the ingredient roster well beyond ketones, listing maqui berry, Rhodiola rosea, Amla fruit, Theobroma cacao, Haematococcus pluvialis (astaxanthin), Schisandra, and bilberry among constituents claimed to support metabolism, antioxidant status, mood or appetite control ^{[2] [4] [5]}. These items appear in analyses from June through October 2025 and suggest a strategy of combining ketone salts with botanicals to broaden appeal. However, the reported lists are inconsistent about which botanicals are present and in what amounts; no single source in the set provides a full, validated supplement facts panel, which limits the ability to evaluate dosages or evidence for the combined formulation ^{[2] [4]}.

3. Red Flags in Reporting: Missing Labels and Accusations of Deceptive Marketing

Not all sources provide ingredient detail; some explicitly note the absence of transparent labeling or rely on second‑hand claims, and at least one analysis accuses the product’s marketing of fabricating endorsements and omitting clear ingredient disclosures ^{[6] [7]}. These critiques, published in mid‑2025 and September 2025 respectively, underscore a real risk: if product pages or reviews omit a verified supplement facts label, consumers cannot confirm active ingredients, doses, or allergens, which is a governance and safety issue for dietary supplements marketed for weight loss ^{[6] [7]}.

4. Outliers and Unverified Additions: Vitamins, Nootropics and Visual Supplements

A minority of reports attribute a disparate set of components — vitamins B6 and B12, lutein, zeaxanthin, Brahmi, AGP choline, ginkgo biloba, cinnamon extract — that read like a fusion of cognitive, ocular and metabolic support ingredients rather than a focused weight‑loss formula ^[5]. These lists come from late summer 2025 and may indicate either erroneous aggregation of multiple products or marketing that aims to broaden perceived benefit. Such divergent ingredient claims increase the likelihood of reporting errors or deliberate product‑bundling language intended to appeal to multiple consumer concerns, and they further validate the need for consumers to demand a clear, dated supplement facts label before purchase ^[5].

5. What This Means for Consumers: Verify, Prioritize Safety, and Seek the Label

Given the inconsistent and sometimes contradictory ingredient reports across June–November 2025 analyses, the prudent consumer approach is straightforward: insist on the product’s official supplement facts panel and batch information, verify BHB salt presence if ketosis claims are central, and consult a clinician about interactions — especially if stimulants or multiple botanicals are reported ^{[1] [3] [4]}. Sources that flagged marketing problems and missing ingredient transparency provide a strong justification for skepticism; until a verified label is available, treat specific efficacy or safety claims as unconfirmed and potentially incomplete ^{[6] [7]}.