What manufacturer makes Burn Peak and where can I find the Supplement Facts label?

1. What the brand itself is asserting — production claims without an identity

The official Burn Peak webpages consistently state the product is manufactured in the USA in FDA‑registered, GMP‑certified facilities, a claim repeated across multiple site captures and summaries, including a September 10, 2025 snapshot ^{[3] [4]}. Those pages list primary ingredient types — notably Magnesium, Calcium, and Sodium Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate (BHB salts) and references to a proprietary blend of plant extracts — but they stop short of naming the contract manufacturer, company owner, or a specific production facility. This creates a situation where quality claims are publicly asserted but not traceable to a named legal entity, preventing straightforward verification of chain‑of‑custody or corporate responsibility ^{[1] [5]}.

2. The conspicuous absence of a Supplement Facts label on public pages

Multiple independent analyses of the available online materials conclude that the Supplement Facts label is not shown on the official product pages and that only general ingredient descriptions appear online ^{[1] [5]}. The absence of a label prevents consumers from seeing serving size, per‑serving amounts of active compounds, excipient lists, or allergen statements, information that regulators and clinicians use to assess dosage, safety, and interactions. Analysts repeatedly recommend obtaining the physical packaging or contacting the seller/manufacturer directly to access the full Supplement Facts and confirm exact dosages and non‑active ingredients ^{[1] [5]}.

3. Marketplace evidence points to third‑party sellers, not an identified manufacturer

At least one marketplace listing shows Burn Peak being sold by a third‑party seller, NutraKingz Supplements, on eBay, reinforcing that retail distribution is occurring through reseller channels rather than through a transparent manufacturer portal ^[2]. This listing corroborates the practical reality that consumers may encounter the product through resellers whose listings sometimes include incomplete information; the only available route to the Supplement Facts in these cases is direct contact with the seller or inspection of the shipped product. The eBay presence is a factual data point that differentiates retail availability from manufacturer transparency ^[2].

4. Regulatory context and what the available checks reveal

Analyses performed as of October and September 2025 found no explicit FDA warnings or recalls for Burn Peak in the provided dataset, but experts flagged a broader pattern: weight‑loss supplements frequently show regulatory gaps or illicit additives in other brands, creating a credible reason for caution when a brand lacks transparent manufacturer identification ^{[6] [7]}. The brand’s claims of FDA‑registered facilities and GMP certification are reassuring if true, but these claims alone are insufficient without a named manufacturer or a Supplement Facts label to cross‑check facility registrations, NDC/registration entries, or state licensing records ^{[3] [8]}.

5. Where facts diverge and why that matters to consumers

Sources converge on two hard facts: Burn Peak is marketed as U.S.‑made with BHB salts and a proprietary plant blend, and the public sites do not present the Supplement Facts or a manufacturer name ^{[1] [5] [4]}. They diverge on the degree of confidence to place in the manufacturing claims: site copy asserts FDA/GMP status, while independent reviewers and marketplace listings emphasize the absence of verifiable identifiers, meaning consumers cannot independently confirm those regulatory assertions without additional documentation ^{[1] [8]}.

6. Practical next steps for verification and safe purchasing

To obtain the Supplement Facts and confirm the manufacturer, request a clear photograph of the product label or the lot‑specific Supplement Facts from the seller before purchase, or ask Burn Peak customer support for the manufacturing company name and facility registration numbers; if provided, cross‑check those against state or federal facility registries and any FDA inspection/registration records ^{[2] [5]}. If a seller declines or cannot produce a label, treat that as a red flag and consider alternatives with transparent labeling and traceable manufacturers; the dataset’s analysts explicitly recommend obtaining packaging or seller verification as the only reliable way to see the Supplement Facts ^{[1] [5]}.