Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the exact active ingredients in Burn Peak supplement?
Executive Summary
Multiple provided analyses converge on a core claim that Burn Peak’s primary active ingredients are Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate (BHB) salts — typically magnesium, calcium, and sodium BHB — while other sources and product pages list a variety of botanical extracts and antioxidants (Maqui berry, Rhodiola, bilberry, brahmi, lutein/zeaxanthin, etc.), producing inconsistent ingredient lists across sources [1] [2] [3]. The strongest, date-stamped source identifies BHB salts explicitly on the official product page (2025-07-15), but multiple analyses show disagreement about secondary ingredients and missing dosage details, leaving the exact formulation and amounts unresolved [1] [4] [3].
1. Bold Core Claim: BHB Ketone Salts Dominate the Narrative
The most consistent, repeatable claim across the analyses is that Burn Peak’s formula centers on Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate (BHB) salts — magnesium, calcium, and sodium BHB as the active ketone components intended to induce or support ketosis and fat-burning metabolism. This assertion appears on multiple official-looking product summaries and review snippets and is explicitly named in the most recent dated page (product page dated 2025-07-15), which lists Magnesium Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate, Calcium Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate, and Sodium Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate as principal ingredients [1] [2] [4]. The repeated mention of BHB salts across independent analyses indicates consensus on the primary active chemical class, even as other components vary.
2. Competing Lists: Antioxidants, Adaptogens, and Plant Extracts
Beyond BHB salts, the analyses diverge sharply. Several sources claim the product contains Maqui berry, Rhodiola, Haematococcus (astaxanthin source), Amla, Schisandra, Theobroma cacao, bilberry extract, Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri), lutein, zeaxanthin, and other plant-derived ingredients purportedly for antioxidant, cognitive, eye-health, or metabolic support [3] [1] [5]. These additional items appear on official and affiliate pages without consistent overlap: some pages emphasize adaptogens and berry antioxidants; others list green tea, garcinia, cayenne, or caffeine as supportive components [3] [4]. The variation suggests multiple marketing versions or inconsistent product descriptions rather than a single authoritative ingredient roster.
3. Dates, Source Types, and Reliability Signals
The strongest date-specific evidence is the Burn Peak official product page dated 2025-07-15, which lists BHB salts and several botanical ingredients [1]. A later analysis titled “Burn Peak Clarifies Authentic Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate Formula” is dated 2025-10-09, and reiterates the BHB focus [6]. Many other analyses lack publication dates and are hosted on affiliate/review sites or unspecified “official” pages, reducing provenance clarity [3] [2] [4] [5]. Official-looking pages with no dates or affiliate review pages frequently add or omit secondary ingredients, raising the possibility of marketing-driven edits or regional formulation differences. The dated official page and the October clarification together strengthen the BHB salts claim while leaving secondary ingredients ambiguous [1] [6].
4. Gaps That Matter: Dosages, Standardization, and Verification
None of the provided analyses supply exact dosages, per‑serving amounts, or third‑party lab verification for the named ingredients, which are critical to assessing efficacy and safety. Multiple product summaries list ingredient names but omit quantitative details, and some claim additional components like caffeine or green tea without specifying presence or amount [4] [3]. The absence of label-level transparency prevents evaluation of whether the product’s BHB content matches clinical trial dosages or whether botanical extracts are present at physiologically active levels. This omission of concentration data and testing certificates is a common issue with supplement marketing materials in the sources provided.
5. Competing Agendas: Marketing Pages vs. Review Coverage
Official product pages and affiliate review sites inherently have different incentives: manufacturer pages promote efficacy and list proprietary blends, while review sites may aggregate positive-sounding claims or extract partial lists to bolster impressions [1] [3]. Several analyses appear to derive their ingredient lists directly from Burn Peak marketing materials, which can explain the inclusion of trending botanicals such as maqui berry or bacopa that strengthen health‑claim narratives. Conversely, some review pages emphasize BHB salts as the core “ketone” selling point, aligning with market demand for exogenous ketones [2] [4]. These competing agendas produce inconsistent ingredient lists across the set.
6. Bottom Line: What Can Be Stated and What Remains Unverified
Based on the provided analyses, it is verifiable that Burn Peak contains Beta‑Hydroxybutyrate (BHB) salts — magnesium, calcium, and sodium BHB — as principal active ketone ingredients, corroborated by a dated official product page (2025-07-15) and an October clarification [1] [6]. Claims about additional ingredients such as Maqui berry, Rhodiola, bilberry, brahmi, lutein/zeaxanthin, green tea, garcinia, and caffeine are inconsistent across sources and lack dosage and third‑party verification in the materials provided [3] [4] [5]. To determine the exact full ingredient list and amounts, inspect the product label or a recent Certificate of Analysis from the manufacturer; without those, the formulation’s secondary components and concentrations remain unconfirmed [1] [2].