What state-funded programs for maternal health and postpartum care were launched under Newsom?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration launched multiple state-funded maternal and postpartum initiatives including the Strong Start & Beyond movement and the “Momnibus” package that extended Medi‑Cal postpartum coverage to 12 months and added Medi‑Cal coverage for doulas [1] [2]. California also secured federal and philanthropic awards to fund innovation — a five‑year $10 million HRSA Maternal Health Innovation grant and selection for the federal TMaH model with $17 million in CMS funding — and proposed budget items such as a diaper initiative ($7.4M in 2025–26 rising to $12.5M in 2026–27) and continued provider rate increases for maternal care [3] [4] [5] [6].
1. Strong Start & Beyond: a headline statewide campaign
In September 2024 the Office of the California Surgeon General rolled out Strong Start & Beyond, a statewide movement aimed at cutting maternal mortality by 50% by December 2026 and coordinating interventions from preconception through postpartum care; the governor proclaimed a Strong Start & Beyond Day and his office framed the effort as building on the Momnibus and other policies to target racial disparities [1] [7].
2. Momnibus and statutory expansions: changing Medi‑Cal postpartum coverage and doulas
Newsom signed S.B. 65 — the California “Momnibus” Act — which the state says expands Medi‑Cal to cover doulas, extends postpartum Medi‑Cal eligibility to 12 months, eases access to public assistance for pregnant people, and funds a guaranteed‑income pilot for low‑income families; the administration cites these as central, law‑level reforms to address racial gaps in maternal outcomes [2] [8].
3. Federal and grant funding stacked on state programs
California won major federal awards to support maternal innovation: HRSA granted a $10 million State Maternal Health Innovation award to coordinate work through the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, and DHCS was chosen for CMS’s Transforming Maternal Health (TMaH) Model which will bring about $17 million in funding over the model’s course, emphasizing value‑based care, coordination, provider training and addressing social drivers [3] [4] [9].
4. Budgetary moves: diapers, provider rates and line‑item choices
The 2025–26 proposed budget preserved provider rate increases for primary and maternal care initiated in 2024 and earmarked up to $7.4 million (rising to $12.5 million in 2026–27) for a diaper initiative providing a three‑month diaper supply to newborn families via hospitals — an explicitly maternal/newborn health support — while budget maneuvers around Medi‑Cal funding have drawn criticism for shifting voter‑approved health revenue [6] [5] [10].
5. Maternal mental health and workforce initiatives
California has pursued expansions tied to behavioral and maternal mental health: state laws and programs extended postpartum coverage where applicable and created pathways for postpartum behavioral‑health supports; the state’s Maternal Health Innovation efforts convened a Maternal Health Task Force and provided enhancement awards to doula organizations serving Medi‑Cal communities [11] [9].
6. Outcomes, disparities and critics: what sources stress
State announcements and grantees frame these programs as targeted to reduce Black and Native American maternal deaths, but reporting and advocacy pieces note persistent disparities and warn that investments must be sustained and accountable; independent outlets and advocates also flagged concern when budget proposals shifted funds within Medi‑Cal, prompting warnings that provider pay and reproductive‑care investments could be weakened [3] [10] [12].
7. What reporting does not say (limits of available sources)
Available sources do not mention detailed statewide metrics showing that these post‑2024 efforts have already achieved the 50% mortality reduction goal, nor do they provide long‑term independent evaluations of the TMaH or HRSA awards’ impacts; comprehensive outcome data through December 2026 and detailed cost‑benefit analyses are not found in the current reporting (not found in current reporting).
8. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas
State press releases and First Partner advocacy frame the initiatives as bold, equity‑centered policy solutions [1] [3]. Budget advocates and some medical groups raise alarms about reallocation of Medi‑Cal funds away from voter‑mandated provider increases [10]. These competing narratives reflect different priorities: expanding service access and innovation versus protecting existing funding streams and provider payment commitments.
9. Takeaway for readers
California under Newsom combined lawmaking (Momnibus), executive‑office initiatives (Strong Start & Beyond), federal grant competition (HRSA, CMS TMaH) and budget proposals (diaper program, provider rate maintenance) to expand maternal and postpartum supports; the effectiveness of these layered investments depends on implementation, sustained funding, and transparent outcome tracking — areas current reporting says need further, independent evaluation [2] [3] [4] [6].
Limitations: this account is drawn solely from the provided sources and flags where outcome data or independent evaluations are not present in that reporting (not found in current reporting).