Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Can men get pregnant?

Checked on November 24, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Medical reporting and clinical resources say: anyone who has a functioning uterus and ovaries can become pregnant — that includes many transgender men and some non‑binary people who were assigned female at birth (AFAB) [1] [2] [3]. People born with a typical male reproductive system (cisgender men without a uterus and ovaries) cannot become pregnant with current medical technology, though researchers and media note work on assisted approaches and uterus‑transplant research that may change possibilities in the future — coverage on that is limited in the provided results [2] [1] [4].

1. Who medical sources say can become pregnant — anatomy matters

Pregnancy requires a uterus and ovaries (and egg and sperm meeting, or assisted reproduction). Health resources state clearly: “Any individual with a uterus and ovaries can get pregnant,” and that includes transgender men and some non‑binary people who retain those organs [1] [2] [3]. Those sources emphasize that masculinizing hormone therapy (testosterone) commonly suppresses menstruation and ovulation but does not reliably prevent pregnancy — trans men taking testosterone have become pregnant, and some stop testosterone when trying to conceive [1] [2] [5].

2. What “men” means in these discussions — sex, gender, and reporting differences

Different outlets define “men” differently: clinical pieces use anatomy/biology to say people born with a male reproductive system cannot get pregnant, while several trans‑focused health sites and clinics use the term “men” to include trans men (AFAB transmasculine people) who still have reproductive organs [2] [3]. This semantic difference drives much public confusion and online debate; some stories that provoke outrage (for example, an alleged NHS diagram) stem from disagreement over whether “male‑presenting” or “trans men” should be described as able to be pregnant [6].

3. Contraception, hormones, and real‑world pregnancies among trans men

Authorities note that testosterone is not a reliable contraceptive: masculinizing hormone therapy often stops periods within months but does not guarantee infertility, so unprotected vaginal sex can still result in pregnancy [1] [5]. Clinical reviews and case series exist — for example, small surveys have documented transgender men who stopped testosterone and carried pregnancies to term — but the available sources show these data are limited in scale and context [1].

4. Limits of current technology — cis men, uterus transplants, and research headlines

Most sources state it is not currently possible for cisgender men (those born with a typical male reproductive system and without a uterus/ovaries) to carry a pregnancy using their native anatomy [2]. However, reporting and specialist discussion note emerging technologies — uterus transplants and research on cross‑sex pregnancy possibilities — that raise the prospect of different scenarios in future; but the provided results do not detail established clinical protocols enabling routine pregnancy in cis men and coverage is sparse [1] [4]. Where a source explicitly frames future possibility, it is cautious and framed as research or innovation rather than established practice [4].

5. Social and clinical implications — stigma, care access, and misinfo

Health and advocacy pieces stress that people who do become pregnant while identifying as men face unique challenges: misgendering by clinicians, gaps in inclusive care, and mental‑health risks like perinatal depression may be higher in transgender populations, per some reviews [2] [3]. Media controversies (e.g., outrage over an NHS “male pregnancy” diagram) show how political and cultural agendas amplify confusion; reporting on those incidents points out that outrage often mixes factual inaccuracy with ideological opposition [6].

6. What the available sources do not answer or quantify

The provided sources do not offer comprehensive population‑level statistics on how many trans men become pregnant each year, nor do they present large randomized studies on fertility outcomes for trans men on or off testosterone (available sources do not mention detailed epidemiology). They also do not present a definitive, peer‑reviewed pathway showing routine cis‑male pregnancy via transplant or other technologies is clinically established — the literature cited is exploratory and framed as future research [4] [1].

Conclusion: Using the definitions in medical practice, pregnancy is an anatomical/physiological phenomenon tied to the presence of a uterus and ovaries; that means many trans men (AFAB who retain those organs) can and do become pregnant, while cisgender men without those organs cannot with current standard care. There is ongoing research into new reproductive technologies, and public debate often conflates definitions of “man” with reproductive anatomy, which fuels confusion and political controversy [1] [2] [4] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Can transgender men become pregnant and what medical steps enable it?
Are cisgender men biologically capable of pregnancy under any circumstances?
What are the health risks and prenatal care needs for pregnant transgender men?
How do laws and insurance policies handle pregnancy and parental leave for trans men?
What fertility preservation or assisted reproduction options exist for people assigned female at birth who transition to male?