Can spike protein cause blood clotting or cardiovascular issues in humans?

Checked on February 5, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The scientific record shows that SARS‑CoV‑2 Spike protein (S protein) can interact with vascular cells, trigger inflammatory and procoagulant pathways in cell and animal models, and has been detected in the blood of infected humans—mechanistic and observational data therefore support a plausible link between Spike exposure and clotting or cardiovascular dysfunction [1] [2] [3]. However, most direct demonstrations come from in vitro or animal studies and mechanistic inference; proving Spike alone causes clinically meaningful thrombosis in humans, independent of whole‑virus infection or systemic illness, remains unresolved in the clinical literature [4] [5].

1. Clinical association: COVID-19 brings endothelial injury, thrombosis, and cardiovascular events

Large clinical and review studies document that SARS‑CoV‑2 infection is associated with microthrombi, arterial and venous thromboses, myocardial injury, arrhythmia and other cardiovascular complications in patients, and that these phenomena contribute substantially to morbidity and mortality in COVID‑19 [4] [1]. These reports establish that the infection is a procoagulant, vasculopathic state, but they do not by themselves isolate the Spike protein as the sole causal factor versus contributions from viral replication, hypoxia, cytokine storm, comorbid disease and other pathways [4].

2. Mechanistic cell biology: Spike engages vascular receptors and procoagulant signaling

A string of in vitro studies shows that full Spike, its receptor‑binding domain (RBD), or Spike fragments bind endothelial or perivascular receptors (ACE2, CD147, integrins) and activate NF‑κB, ERK1/2 and other inflammatory programs that raise adhesion molecules, tissue factor and von Willebrand factor—molecules central to leukocyte adhesion, endothelial permeability and clotting [6] [2] [7]. Those experiments report increased cytokines (IL‑6, IL‑1β, TNFα) and procoagulant factor expression after Spike exposure, providing biologic plausibility that Spike can shift endothelial cells toward a prothrombotic phenotype [6] [7].

3. Experimental thrombosis: animal and ex vivo clotting evidence

In vivo and ex vivo models report rapid thrombus formation or structurally abnormal clots after administration of Spike protein, and some groups describe competitive heparan‑sulfate binding and fibrin interactions that could accelerate coagulation—results that argue Spike can directly promote clot formation in controlled systems [3] [8]. Such models are powerful for mechanism but are limited by dose, route and species differences; they do not by themselves prove equivalent effects occur in typical human exposures during infection or vaccination [3] [8].

4. Spike detection in humans and implications for causality

Multiple studies detect circulating Spike or Spike fragments in the plasma of COVID‑19 patients—especially the severely ill—and Spike has been identified in platelets and thrombi, which supports the biological relevance of the mechanistic findings to human disease [9] [1]. Detecting Spike in blood establishes exposure but does not by itself quantify how much free Spike (versus intact virus, immune complexes or cell‑bound Spike) is required to trigger clinically significant thrombosis in humans [1] [9].

5. Vaccines, theoretical risks, and evidence gaps

Reviews have outlined theoretical mechanisms by which vaccine‑expressed Spike could, in rare scenarios, interact with vascular cells or immune effectors (platelet binding, complement activation), and some small studies report transient Spike or mRNA detectable after vaccination—yet the clinical trial and post‑marketing safety data show that serious thrombotic events after mRNA vaccines are rare and causal attribution remains contentious and limited in the peer‑reviewed record provided here [9]. The sources supplied summarize hypotheses and sporadic detections but do not establish a routine, vaccine‑driven Spike‑mediated thrombosis mechanism in people [9].

6. Bottom line and what remains unknown

Converging mechanistic, animal and observational data make it biologically plausible that Spike protein can contribute to endothelial dysfunction and a procoagulant state—and free or shed Spike has been measured in human blood during infection—supporting a role for Spike in the thromboinflammatory picture of COVID‑19 [6] [2] [1]. Nonetheless, definitive proof that Spike alone, at the concentrations and contexts present in typical human infection or after vaccination, is sufficient to cause clinically meaningful thrombosis or cardiovascular disease independent of other viral or host factors is not settled by the sources provided and requires controlled clinical and quantitative exposure‑response data that are not present in these reports [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What concentrations of circulating SARS‑CoV‑2 Spike protein are observed in hospitalized versus mild COVID‑19 patients, and how do those levels compare to doses used in animal experiments?
Which receptors (ACE2, CD147, integrins) mediate Spike‑driven coagulation in human endothelial cells, and are there approved drugs that block those interactions?
What large epidemiological studies link COVID‑19 vaccination to thrombotic events, and how do they distinguish vaccine effects from background rates and infection‑related risks?