Did Charlie Kirk say that Birth Control messes with women's brains?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The statement in question pertains to whether Charlie Kirk said that birth control messes with women's brains. According to [1], Charlie Kirk indeed stated that 'birth control really screws up female brains... It increases depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation' [1]. This claim is also supported by [1], which reports Charlie Kirk stating that 'birth control really screws up female brains' and that it 'increases depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation' [1]. However, [2] contradicts this claim, citing experts who say there is no definitive evidence that birth control causes depression or alters brain structure [2]. [3] provides a more neutral perspective, mentioning a preliminary study that found a possible link between birth control and brain structure change, but emphasizes that the findings should be treated with caution [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key aspect missing from the original statement is the context in which Charlie Kirk made these comments. [4] mentions that Charlie Kirk made a series of controversial statements regarding women’s rights and health issues, including that birth control makes women 'angry and bitter' [4]. However, [5], [6], and [7] do not mention Charlie Kirk's statement about birth control affecting women's brains, instead discussing his views on women having full-time jobs and a family, his controversial views on abortion and gun rights, and the aftermath of his death, respectively [5] [6] [7]. [2] and [3] highlight the importance of considering expert opinions and scientific evidence when evaluating the effects of birth control on women's health [2] [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or biased as it does not provide a comprehensive view of Charlie Kirk's comments or the scientific consensus on the effects of birth control. [1] and [1] may be seen as supporting Charlie Kirk's claim, potentially benefiting those who oppose birth control or women's reproductive rights [1]. On the other hand, [2] and [3] provide a more nuanced perspective, benefiting those who prioritize scientific evidence and women's health [2] [3]. The omission of context and alternative viewpoints in the original statement may be seen as selective reporting, potentially benefiting those who seek to promote a particular agenda or ideology [4] [5] [6] [7].