What nominal width condom brands offer sizes below 50mm or above 60mm?

1. Small‑width (below 50 mm): specialist lines and imports dominate the shelf

Multiple retailers and condom specialists identify a class of “small” condoms with nominal widths in the 45–51 mm range, which puts true sub‑50 mm options squarely in the market but typically through specialty labels rather than mass supermarket brands ^{[5] [6]}. WorldCondoms and Condomerie both catalog S–M or “small” options intended for users whose flat nominal width is 50 mm or less and explicitly list brands frequently associated with narrower sizes — examples named by retailers include Beyond Seven, Crown and Caution Wear as common small‑size offerings ^{[4] [7] [5]}. MyONE’s custom‑fit program similarly markets very small sizes and claims to include the “smallest condom size in the world,” reflecting a deliberate product strategy to cover widths under conventional ranges ^[1].

2. Large and extra‑large (above 60 mm): MY.SIZE, XXL lines and custom brands

For nominal widths at or above 60 mm, several brands and curated sellers advertise XXL or “super large” condoms; MY.SIZE and other regional suppliers are repeatedly cited for 60 mm options and larger XXL lines, while UK/European retailers stock extra‑large ranges that can reach into the mid‑60s and beyond ^{[2] [8] [9]}. Condoms.uk describes extra large condoms as typically ranging from 60–69 mm and points consumers toward MY.SIZE for 60 mm products, and other retailers discuss Durex XXL, Trustex and Trojan as examples commonly associated with larger nominal widths ^{[2] [3]}. Specialist makers like TheyFit and MyONE also pursue custom‑fit portfolios that extend the high end of nominal widths beyond what single‑size mainstream brands normally provide ^{[3] [10]}.

3. Who to look for: names that appear across multiple sources

Retail aggregators and sex‑health resources repeatedly surface a short list of manufacturers and lines when discussing extremes: MyONE (MyONE®/ONE® custom sizes) and MY.SIZE are highlighted for wide ranges and reaching below 50 mm and up to 60 mm and beyond; boutique brands such as Crown and Beyond Seven are often cited for smaller fits; supermarket/legacy brands like Durex and Trojan are referenced in conversations about XXL sizes though specific widths vary by model and region ^{[1] [4] [2] [3]}. TheyFit and other custom‑size vendors are uniquely positioned to offer dozens of discrete nominal widths to suit nonstandard girths ^[3].

4. Evidence quality and practical limits: retailer claims, rounding, and regional variation

Most available reporting comes from brand pages, specialist retailers and health‑education sites rather than standardized global specifications; manufacturers and distributors frequently round millimetres, and what one company calls “regular” or “small” can differ in another’s catalogue, so cross‑referencing specific product labels matters for buyers ^{[10] [11]}. Health outlets give a typical mainstream width range of roughly 40–60 mm, flagging that anything below 50 mm or above 60 mm sits at the market’s tails and is therefore more commonly sold by specialized lines or custom services ^{[12] [6]}. This reporting does not provide an exhaustive, up‑to‑the‑minute brand inventory for every country; it shows a pattern: sub‑50 mm and super‑60 mm condoms exist, but they are concentrated among custom offerings, imported boutique brands and XXL product lines rather than uniform across every mainstream label ^{[5] [3] [2]}.

5. Practical advice implied by the evidence

The consistent guidance across retailers and medical sites is to measure girth and match nominal width deliberately — retailers note that nominal width is the key comparative metric and that fit differences between brands matter, which is why shoppers seeking under 50 mm or over 60 mm typically turn to MyONE, MY.SIZE, boutique imports (Crown, Beyond Seven) or custom manufacturers like TheyFit ^{[13] [10] [4] [3]}. Where the sources stop short is a comprehensive, brand‑by‑brand table mapping exact nominal widths globally; consumers are therefore best served by checking product specifications on seller pages or choosing custom‑fit services if standard ranges don’t match measured girth ^{[11] [10]}.