What deaths have national regulators (CDC, MHRA, EMA) confirmed as caused by COVID-19 vaccines?

Checked on February 2, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

National regulators have confirmed only a very small number of deaths as causally linked to COVID‑19 vaccines: the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and FDA have identified nine deaths causally associated with the Janssen/Johnson & Johnson vaccine through thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have flagged rare severe adverse events (for example myocarditis after mRNA vaccines and TTS after adenoviral‑vector vaccines) but have not published broad lists of confirmed vaccine‑caused deaths beyond specific, rare syndromes and individual assessments [1] [2] [3].

1. CDC: nine deaths linked to J&J via TTS — the agency’s narrow, documented finding

CDC and FDA clinicians reviewed VAERS reports, medical records, death certificates and autopsies and reported that continued monitoring identified nine deaths causally associated with the Janssen (J&J) COVID‑19 vaccine through thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, a rare immune‑mediated clotting disorder; outside those nine cases the agencies have stated they “have not detected any unusual or unexpected patterns for deaths following immunization” that would indicate vaccines broadly caused deaths [1] [4].

2. EMA: safety signals, cautious causality assessments, no sweeping confirmation of vaccine‑caused deaths

The EMA set up rapid, public monthly safety updates and its Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) analyzed deaths reported after vaccination — for example assessing deaths among frail, elderly people after Comirnaty — but its public stance has been to evaluate each signal in context of background death rates and comorbidities rather than to assert a large number of vaccine‑caused deaths; EMA has formally warned of myocarditis/pericarditis risk with mRNA vaccines and linked TTS to adenoviral‑vector vaccines, yet its communications emphasize very rare occurrence and benefit‑risk balance rather than listing many regulator‑confirmed vaccine deaths [2] [5].

3. MHRA/Yellow Card: raw reports do not equal confirmed causal deaths

The UK MHRA’s Yellow Card scheme collected reports that included fatalities, but the agency and related communications have repeatedly cautioned that spontaneous reports are not proof of causation and that some events would have occurred regardless of vaccination; FOI material and MHRA pages direct people to case reports but do not equate report counts with regulator‑confirmed vaccine‑caused deaths [6] [3].

4. What regulators have explicitly confirmed — limited, syndrome‑specific conclusions

Regulators converged on a small set of syndrome‑level causal links: TTS after adenoviral‑vector vaccines (linked to some fatalities, including the nine J&J deaths identified by U.S. authorities) and myocarditis/pericarditis after mRNA vaccines as a recognized vaccine‑associated adverse event (usually non‑fatal and rare), with regulators stressing that deaths directly caused by vaccines are extremely rare and that overall vaccination reduces COVID‑19 mortality [1] [5] [4].

5. The cacophony of reports vs. confirmed causality — why numbers differ

Large raw counts from passive systems (VAERS, Yellow Card, EudraVigilance) include any death that occurs after vaccination and are useful for signal detection, but regulators, epidemiologists and independent reviewers repeatedly warn that these reports do not establish cause and effect; sensational interpretations claiming mass vaccine deaths misread passive‑reporting totals without the clinical review, and reputable fact‑checks and academic reviews conclude there is no evidence that vaccines caused the excess deaths seen in some datasets [3] [4] [7].

6. Limits of available reporting and where uncertainty remains

Peer‑reviewed case compilations in the literature document dozens of individual fatal cases discussed by clinicians (for example a literature review found 55 deaths in published reports after EMA‑authorized vaccines), but those papers do not equate to regulator confirmations and often stress the difficulty of proving causality; regulators base confirmed causal death findings on clinical review, epidemiology and comparison with background rates, and outside the specific TTS fatalities and recognized myocarditis risk they have not reported broad lists of confirmed vaccine‑caused deaths [5] [2].

Conclusion

The authoritative, regulator‑level answer is narrow and specific: regulators have confirmed a tiny number of deaths causally linked to particular, rare vaccine‑associated syndromes (notably TTS with adenoviral‑vector vaccines as documented by U.S. agencies with nine confirmed J&J deaths), while the bulk of post‑vaccination death reports remain reported events under investigation and are not accepted by CDC, EMA or MHRA as proven vaccine‑caused deaths; passive reporting system totals should not be read as confirmed causal counts without the clinical and epidemiologic reviews regulators perform [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How do regulators determine causality for deaths reported after vaccination (CDC, EMA, MHRA methods)?
What is thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and how was it linked to adenoviral COVID vaccines?
How do passive surveillance systems (VAERS, Yellow Card, EudraVigilance) differ from active safety monitoring in detecting vaccine‑related deaths?