Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does consensual anal sex affect anal sphincter function over time?
Executive summary
Research is limited and mixed: population survey analysis found people who reported anal intercourse had higher rates of monthly fecal incontinence and lower manometry pressures in some subgroups, but authors and reporters emphasize these results do not prove causation and call for more study [1] [2]. Case reports and clinical reviews show that forceful or non‑consensual anal trauma can cause frank sphincter rupture and permanent damage, while public health and sex‑education outlets generally say consensual, careful anal sex usually causes no long‑term harm for most people [3] [4] [5].
1. What the large surveys show — correlation, not proof
A pooled analysis of 6,150 adults from the 2009–2010 NHANES cycle found people reporting anal intercourse had higher prevalence of fecal incontinence and, in some smaller series, lower anal manometry pressures; women reporting anal intercourse were about 50% more likely to report monthly fecal incontinence, and men who reported anal intercourse also showed higher incontinence rates in the dataset [1] [6] [2]. Reporters and the study authors explicitly note the data are cross‑sectional and cannot establish that anal sex caused the leakage — reverse causation, recall biases, and unmeasured confounders could contribute [2].
2. Mechanisms clinicians and reviewers propose
Authors suggest biologic plausibility: repeated stretching could reduce internal sphincter resting tone, sensory nerve function, or lead to micro‑injury that accumulates over time, which might produce stool leakage in susceptible people [1] [7]. Reviews of pelvic‑floor effects note that continence depends on multiple structures (internal/external sphincters, pelvic floor muscles, sensation), so damage need not be limited to one muscle [8].
3. Severe injuries — uncommon but documented
Surgical case reports document complete sphincter disruption from intercourse, typically associated with coercion, assault, alcohol/drug use, lack of lubrication, or extreme trauma; these are rare but can produce permanent structural damage and require operative repair [3] [4]. European case series of unwanted penetration reported internal sphincter disruption in all cases studied, underscoring that non‑consensual or violent events carry distinct risk [4].
4. Harm reduction and prevention messaging
Clinical investigators and public health outlets recommend measures to reduce risk: adequate lubrication, gradual dilation, avoiding force, open communication, pelvic‑floor/anal strengthening exercises, and medical attention for pain or bleeding. Some clinicians recommend pelvic‑floor training to guard against decreased sphincter tone [6] [9]. Sex‑education sources say with safe technique most people do not experience long‑term harm, though a small lifetime risk of leakage or aggravation of preexisting problems exists [5].
5. Conflicting perspectives and where disagreement lies
Sex‑educators and Planned Parenthood emphasize that consensual, careful anal sex “doesn't cause long‑term harm” for most people and that risks are small with safe practice [5]. By contrast, surgical/medical reviews and some commentators stress higher reported incontinence rates among people who practice anal intercourse and warn of biologically plausible mechanisms for decreased sphincter tone [1] [7] [2]. Journalistic pieces (The Guardian) highlight concerns for women specifically because of anatomic and reproductive‑history factors that may increase vulnerability [10]. These views are not mutually exclusive: population signals of higher prevalence coexist with expert statements that causation is unproven and that consensual, careful practice often avoids injury.
6. Limitations in available evidence
Available sources show important gaps: most large datasets are cross‑sectional (no long‑term follow‑up), sex‑practice details (frequency, size of insertion, use of lube, coercion) are often missing, and many studies are small or rely on case reports [1] [8]. Reviews repeatedly call for prospective, long‑term research to separate association from causation and to identify which behaviors or vulnerabilities raise true risk [2] [8].
7. Practical takeaways for readers
If you engage in or counsel others about anal sex, follow harm‑reduction practices emphasized across sources: use ample lubricant, progress slowly, avoid force, get prompt care for pain/bleeding, and consider pelvic‑floor/anal exercises if you have symptoms or worries [9] [6] [5]. If there is acute trauma, especially non‑consensual injury, surgical management is sometimes necessary and can be successful, but such injuries can cause lasting problems [3] [4].
Final note: reporting points to an association between reported anal intercourse and higher incontinence prevalence in survey data and to well‑documented—but uncommon—traumatic sphincter injuries; however, causation for consensual, typical anal sex remains unproven in the available literature and calls for prospective study persist [1] [2] [8].