Do corticosteroid injections increase long-term diabetes risk with 3–4 injections per year?

Checked on November 26, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Short-term rises in blood glucose after local corticosteroid injections are well documented: glucose commonly spikes for 1–7 days post-injection in people with diabetes, and higher baseline A1C predicts larger and longer disturbances [1] [2] [3]. Available reporting finds systemic or prolonged systemic corticosteroid exposure raises the long‑term risk of incident type 2 diabetes in a dose‑ and duration‑dependent way (oral/systemic steroids) [4] [5]; but population studies of routine intra‑articular or peri‑articular injections (e.g., 1 injection) generally show minimal long‑term A1C change for most patients [6] [7]. The literature included in results does not directly answer whether receiving 3–4 local steroid injections per year increases long‑term diabetes risk — available sources do not mention that exact frequency and long‑term outcome together.

1. Short‑term glucose effects are clear and measurable

Clinical studies and reviews consistently show that corticosteroid injections given into joints or around soft tissues can enter the circulation and cause transient hyperglycemia, with the biggest effects occurring in the 1–3 day window and sometimes persisting up to a week [1] [3] [8]. Several monitored cohorts using flash or continuous glucose monitoring found temporary rises that occasionally reached very high values but were usually short‑lived and rarely required changes in outpatient diabetes therapy [1] [3].

2. Baseline control predicts who is most affected

Large retrospective and cohort analyses report that a higher pre‑injection A1C is the main predictor of a “greater‑than‑expected” post‑injection rise in A1C; patients with A1C >8% had substantially higher odds of sustained A1C increases versus those with A1C <7% [2]. Reviews and guidance repeatedly emphasize counseling and closer monitoring for people with suboptimally controlled diabetes [2] [6].

3. Systemic steroid exposure does increase incident diabetes risk — but context matters

Multiple reviews and population studies conclude that systemic corticosteroid exposure (especially higher dose and longer duration oral steroids) increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, and there is evidence of dose‑response and duration effects [4] [5]. National guidance and advocacy groups also describe “steroid‑induced diabetes” as a recognized phenomenon more likely with higher doses and longer courses [9] [10].

4. Evidence on intra‑articular/locally administered injections and long‑term diabetes is limited

Several contemporary analyses (including a Clinical Diabetes population study and commentaries) found that a single intra‑articular corticosteroid injection usually does not create a sustained increase in A1C for most people, and serious acute metabolic complications are uncommon; nonetheless the long‑term effect after repeated injections is not well characterized in these reports [6] [7]. Systematic reviews note hyperglycemic effects occur, but emphasize short‑term rather than chronic outcomes [11].

5. The key unanswered question: 3–4 injections per year

None of the provided sources directly study the specific exposure you asked about — 3–4 local steroid injections per year — and long‑term diabetes incidence or A1C trajectory after that repeated schedule. Therefore, available sources do not mention whether that exact injection frequency increases long‑term diabetes risk; extrapolation must be cautious (not found in current reporting).

6. How clinicians and patients balance benefits and risks

Clinical papers and reviews frame decision‑making as individualized: local steroid injections relieve pain and improve function for many musculoskeletal problems, and for many patients the short‑term hyperglycemia is manageable; but physicians are advised to weigh benefits against risks in patients with poor glycemic control, counsel about transient glucose rises, and monitor glucose closely after injection [12] [3] [2]. Guidance implicitly signals greater concern with repeated high cumulative systemic exposure, which is where the stronger evidence for inducing diabetes exists [4].

7. Practical takeaways and alternatives

If you have diabetes or are at high risk, advise clinicians to (a) document baseline A1C, (b) warn you about glucose spikes for several days after injection, (c) arrange closer glucose monitoring or temporary adjustment of therapy if needed, and (d) consider non‑steroid options or spacing injections when feasible. The literature supports this individualized approach while acknowledging the absence of direct evidence about 3–4 local injections per year and long‑term diabetes incidence [2] [1] [3].

Limitations: this analysis uses the supplied articles only; no study among them directly measures long‑term diabetes risk after the precise regimen of 3–4 local corticosteroid injections per year, so any definitive statement about that frequency cannot be made from current reporting (not found in current reporting).

Want to dive deeper?
How do repeated corticosteroid injections affect blood glucose control in people with prediabetes?
What is the difference in diabetes risk between systemic steroid use and local corticosteroid injections?
Are certain corticosteroids or injection sites more likely to cause prolonged hyperglycemia?
What monitoring and mitigation strategies reduce diabetes risk after multiple steroid injections?
What does recent research (2020–2025) say about long-term diabetes incidence after 3–4 steroid injections per year?