Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How do dance focus groups support male prostitutes in Haiti?
Executive Summary
The claim that U.S. Democrats sought to spend $3.6 million on “dance focus groups and cooking classes for male prostitutes in Haiti” is a distorted summary of political attacks and budget documents and is not supported by the available program data; primary reporting shows the $3.6 million figure appears in political criticism of federal spending but the underlying PEPFAR and public health datasets do not corroborate the specific description of funding for dance focus groups for male sex workers [1] [2] [3]. Contemporary reviews and program analyses indicate that U.S. global HIV/AIDS funding has generally been allocated to clinical services, healthcare worker pay, and prevention activities rather than explicit line items labeled as “dance focus groups,” though arts-based interventions and culturally informed outreach do appear in academic and NGO practice literature as part of engagement strategies with Haitian communities [1] [4] [5].
1. Political firestorm: How a budget number became a headline-grabbing accusation
Sen. John Kennedy and others used a $3.6 million figure as an example of “wasteful” spending in July 2025, describing programs that allegedly included pastry classes, cyber cafes, and dance focus groups for male prostitutes to argue for rescissions and cuts; this rhetoric originates in Senate speeches and op-eds and was amplified as a shorthand for perceived frivolous spending [2] [3]. Independent analysis traces the $3.6 million reference to a White House Office of Management and Budget framing of PEPFAR-related allocations and to testimony supporting the Rescissions Act of 2025 rather than to a concrete congressional appropriation explicitly labeled for “dance focus groups,” and the State Department PEPFAR datasets reviewed by analysts show major shares of funds directed to clinical care, prevention and staff rather than the activities claimed in political statements [1].
2. What the program data actually show about PEPFAR spending in Haiti
An expert review of PEPFAR datasets released by the State Department finds no clear $3.6 million line item for pastry classes or dance workshops targeted at male sex workers; instead, PEPFAR funding in country-level datasets is typically assigned to categories like HIV clinical services, prevention commodities, and healthcare personnel, which are aggregated and not itemized into the types of community activities named in political attacks [1]. The same analysis notes that some proposed rescissions did not affect PEPFAR because Senate Republicans exempted that global HIV program from cuts, making the political critique partly moot in the context of what funds were actually at risk in 2025 [1].
3. Academic and NGO practices: where arts, dance and outreach intersect with public health
Scholarly work and community organizations document that dance/movement therapy and arts-based outreach are legitimate public-health tools for engaging traumatized or hard-to-reach populations, including Haitian migrants; a 2024 thesis highlights culturally centered, trauma-informed dance/movement therapy as supportive for recently arrived Haitians, emphasizing nonverbal processing of trauma and the need for trusted community partnerships [4]. NGOs and outreach programs also report using informal social spaces — story-telling, music, dance events and barbershops — to deliver safer-sex information and build relationships with men who might otherwise avoid clinics; these practices do not equate to government-funded “dance focus groups” for sex workers but show how arts and social settings are sometimes embedded in prevention work [5].
4. Gaps between rhetoric and verifiable program details
Available sources reveal a gap between the sensational political description and the program-level evidence: the speeches and op-eds cite aggregated budget figures and use evocative examples to make a fiscal point, while program datasets and NGO descriptions do not provide corroboration that the U.S. government directly funded dance workshops specifically for male prostitutes in Haiti [1] [2] [3] [6]. Academic reviews of peer navigation and harm-reduction programming, and historical controversies about research funding, illustrate recurring political reflexes to portray international health spending as susceptible to misuse, but they do not validate the precise claims about dance focus groups being a discrete, earmarked federal expenditure in Haiti [7] [8].
5. Verdict and takeaways: facts, context and what remains uncertain
The most defensible conclusion is that the headline claim is misleading: political commentary used a budget number and colorful examples to criticize spending, while PEPFAR and program data reviewed do not substantiate a direct, earmarked $3.6 million grant for dance focus groups for male sex workers in Haiti; arts-based outreach exists in public-health practice but is typically part of broader prevention and engagement strategies rather than standalone, high-profile line items [1] [4] [5]. Important uncertainties remain because national budget summaries and public datasets aggregate activities and NGOs may implement culturally specific engagement methods without those methods appearing as discrete federal budget labels, so scrutiny of original grant agreements and implementing-partner budgets would be necessary to close remaining factual gaps [1] [6] [9].