Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Do Apple Watches cause cancer
Executive summary
Available reporting does not establish that Apple Watches cause cancer. Recent lawsuits and a Notre Dame study raise concerns about PFAS (“forever chemicals”) in some smartwatch bands, chemicals that have been associated with increased cancer risk in other contexts (e.g., PFAS linked to cancer in epidemiologic studies) [1] [2]. Public-health authorities and fact-checkers cited in the recent coverage say evidence that wearing a smartwatch causes cancer is weak or lacking, and non‑ionizing radiation from wearables has not been shown to cause cancer [3] [4] [5].
1. Lawsuits and headlines: why the panic started
Several news outlets and legal filings highlight a class-action lawsuit alleging that Apple Watch bands — specifically “Ocean,” “Nike Sport,” and “Sport” variants — contain per‑ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and plaintiffs claim those PFAS are linked to cancers and other health harms [6] [7]. Popular press coverage amplified those claims and social media reaction, producing headlines that implied a direct causal link between wearing an Apple Watch and developing cancer [8].
2. The science behind PFAS and cancer—association, not proof of causation for watches
PFAS are widely described as “forever chemicals” and have been associated with increased risks for certain cancers and other diseases in epidemiologic studies; reporting about the Notre Dame research framed PFAS as linked to cancer and other harms [1]. However, an association between PFAS and cancer in population studies does not, by itself, prove that PFAS in watch bands necessarily cause cancer in wearers — exposure route, dose, bioavailability, and duration matter and are not settled for watch‑band contact in the available reporting [1] [2].
3. What the testing found — high PFAS levels in some bands, but limited scope
University of Notre Dame researchers tested 22 watch brands and reportedly found high PFAS levels in 15 of them, with some levels described as comparable to heavy‑use protective gear [2] [1]. Press coverage notes the study did not always disclose brand‑by‑brand findings in the initial report, and the methodology and exposure translation to human health outcomes are presented as areas needing more research in the articles [1].
4. Exposure pathway and risk: skin contact vs systemic uptake
News reports and fact checks emphasize that risk depends on whether PFAS in bands migrate to skin and then into the body at doses sufficient to raise disease risk; some studies show PFAS can be absorbed through skin under some conditions, but the magnitude and health significance from a wristband remain unclear in current reporting [6] [1]. Fact‑checking outlets concluded claims that Apple Watches cause cancer or systemic damage are “mostly false” because while some bands may contain PFAS, the risk through skin contact appears low based on available evidence [4].
5. Non‑ionizing radiation: a separate concern that lacks evidence
Wearables emit low‑powered radiofrequency (non‑ionizing) radiation; public health agencies note this is different from ionizing radiation that causes DNA damage, and current authoritative summaries state non‑ionizing RF from wearables has not been shown to cause cancer — ongoing research continues, but no established causal link has been demonstrated [3] [9]. Community forums and health experts cited in reporting reiterate there is no credible evidence that wearing an Apple Watch increases cancer risk from RF exposure [10] [5].
6. Company response and regulatory context
Apple has publicly stated its materials undergo testing and said it is phasing out PFAS, while facing litigation alleging nondisclosure of PFAS in certain bands; reporting notes Apple asserts safety and ongoing work to remove PFAS from products [7]. Regulators and researchers are increasingly scrutinizing PFAS across consumer goods, and proposed restrictions in jurisdictions like the EU reflect rising regulatory attention described in coverage [1].
7. What the evidence does and does not support right now
Available sources show: (a) PFAS were detected at high levels in many tested smartwatch bands, raising a plausible cause for concern [2] [1]; (b) epidemiology links PFAS exposure to cancer in broader contexts, but available reporting does not prove that wearing an Apple Watch causes cancer in individuals [1] [6]; and (c) public‑health summaries and fact checks conclude the claim that smartwatches cause cancer is not supported by strong direct evidence and is “mostly false” when stated as a blanket assertion [4] [5].
8. Practical takeaways and open questions
If you’re worried, the reporting suggests simple risk‑management steps: choose silicone bands that some researchers recommended as lower‑PFAS alternatives, follow manufacturer updates, and watch for peer‑reviewed exposure and toxicology studies that quantify skin absorption and long‑term risk from bands specifically [1] [2]. Crucial open questions remain in the public record: exact levels released from specific branded bands to skin, dose over time, and whether those doses approach levels tied to adverse outcomes in human studies — available sources do not yet provide definitive answers to those points [1] [6].