Do dr oz and dr phil claim to have an herb that cures diabetes

1. The specific claim under scrutiny: an herb that cures diabetes

The viral assertions typically promise rapid remission or normalization of blood sugar — sometimes “in three days” or “two weeks” — and are packaged as ads, videos or quote cards that feature or purport to quote television personalities endorsing an herbal or supplement cure ^{[1] [3] [4]}. Multiple fact‑checks and academic labs examined these materials and found them to be manipulated: videos are deepfaked or edited, audio is doctored, and quote cards tie celebrities to unproven products without their consent ^{[8] [2] [3]}.

2. What the evidence shows about Dr. Mehmet Oz’s involvement

Investigations by Poynter, PolitiFact and university media‑forensics teams conclude there is no reliable evidence that Oz has promoted a diabetes cure product in authentic posts or broadcasts; instead, Oz has publicly warned about fake ads using his likeness and has been the target of numerous fabricated endorsements touting “miracle” supplements ^{[1] [3] [4]}. Researchers and forensics experts specifically identified deepfaked clips and asynchronous audio splices in videos that claim he announced breakthroughs, and Oz himself has written about the problem of fake celebrity ads for diabetes cures ^{[2] [7]}.

3. Common forms of the misinformation: gummies, CBD, “Glufarelin” and conspiracies

The false campaigns recycle a handful of motifs — CBD or “gummy” supplements presented as instant cures, invented drugs such as “Glufarelin,” and narratives that Big Pharma is suppressing natural remedies — and often attach Oz’s image to lend credibility despite lacking any regulatory approval or scientific backing ^{[5] [6] [4]}. Fact‑checkers note that dietary supplements legally cannot claim to treat diseases and that the FDA does not approve supplements as cures, undermining the legitimacy of those sales pitches ^[4].

4. What the reporting does not show about Dr. Phil

None of the provided sources document Dr. Phil personally claiming to have an herb that cures diabetes; the fact‑checks and academic debunks focus on Oz, doctored videos and a broader pattern of fraudulent celebrity endorsements, so there is no sourcing here to assert that Dr. Phil made such a claim or was targeted in the same way ^{[1] [3] [4]}. This absence should be read as a limitation of the reviewed reporting, not proof of innocence or guilt beyond what is sourced.

5. Why these scams persist and how to judge future claims

Scammers exploit recognizable names because celebrity association increases conversion; deepfake technology and fabricated quote cards let promoters simulate endorsements while selling a supplement subscription or traffic to dubious sites, and reputable outlets have repeatedly debunked those tactics and urged skepticism toward “secret cure” messaging ^{[7] [9] [10]}. Health experts and agencies make clear there is no known cure for diabetes and that genuine treatments and medications undergo rigorous trials and regulatory oversight — claims of instant cures should be treated as red flags ^[4].

6. Bottom line for readers and policy context

Based on the assembled fact‑checks, academic analyses and reporting, the correct reading is that Dr. Oz has been impersonated and falsely attributed as promoting herbal “cures” for diabetes, while the provided reporting contains no substantiated instance of Dr. Phil making such a claim; consumers should rely on peer‑reviewed research and official medical guidance rather than social media ads or celebrity‑branded marketing ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.